Postman Enterprise
PostmanExternal reviews
1,621 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
The best Utility to test APIs with rich features and simple to use for IT
What do you like best about the product?
I like postman because it has Clear and concise interface for the 'entire' http request lifecycle. In this easy to create test API calls. The features like storing history and auto complete features increase it's efficiency. It supports creating mock servers for your API's. It's export & import API is very good.
What do you dislike about the product?
In postman syncing of changes sometimes does not work properly and need to restart some time. Some more guides need to be provided which would be helpful because sometimes it takes me a while to figure out something.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I am using Postman while working on business solution in one of the leading life insurance organisation, where I need to integrate with many other peripheral systems. So I am using Postman to test those APIs. Which helps me to test and verify those APIs easily and in faster way leading me to save the time.
Best for REST API testing
What do you like best about the product?
Several components for security testing of web services.Variety of test suites can be created.Collection creation to team sharing is quite convenient.Quick addition and removal of parameters are helpful.Desired output formats are handy.from GET to POST all kind of request can be easily configured.
What do you dislike about the product?
User interface is a little complex for simpler tasks,Sometime for basic features we have to search a lot.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Frequently used to test API endpoint,importing and exporting of API.Scripting of project to different language.Unit testing for security and authentication.Customized testing of webservices using different set of parameters.load configuration for REST based web services.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Either in normal or enterprise environment it is perfecf for devlopment and testing.easy configuration is helpful even for begineers but for some features we need to explore a little.All kind of requests including GET or POST are easily configured which prove to be a good point.
Postman Personal Experience
What do you like best about the product?
Request creations from basic GET,POST,PUT is very effective,Transparency to look throughout the process from management to execution level.
Result can be seen in desired formats like JSON,HTML,Text,Tuned control over HTTP requests.
Result can be seen in desired formats like JSON,HTML,Text,Tuned control over HTTP requests.
What do you dislike about the product?
User Interface is comolex for new users ,Sometime it takes a while to find out some features.Saving in multiple collections is troublesome as there is nothing like save dialog box.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
API testing,Sharing across team works well,The whole team can easily view same set of API.Quick add and removal of parameters.Mock servers and mock requests for testing.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It is well suited for all developers to test API and debugging. It can be used for automation API testing as well. It's a good place to store all API and share with the team.
If you deal with APIs use postman
What do you like best about the product?
Postman is a must have for any API developer, building APIs can be a hassle but Postman does a lot of grunt work so that developers can concentrate on what they do best. I came to know about postman from a conference where an API expert was showing a demo of their API and I fell in love with this software from that day onwards.
Automated test running: If your rest API is on the cloud, you can use postman to run periodic tests and status checks and reports back if anything is amiss.
Multiple response type supports: Postman allows users to deal with APIs that respond with JSON, XML and plain HTML pages too.
Debugging APIs: If I use postman, I am easily able to view cookies, get cookies, set cookies and much more.
Affordaitlty: Postman is priced right it is neither too expensive not cheap, it has hit the pricing right.
Automated test running: If your rest API is on the cloud, you can use postman to run periodic tests and status checks and reports back if anything is amiss.
Multiple response type supports: Postman allows users to deal with APIs that respond with JSON, XML and plain HTML pages too.
Debugging APIs: If I use postman, I am easily able to view cookies, get cookies, set cookies and much more.
Affordaitlty: Postman is priced right it is neither too expensive not cheap, it has hit the pricing right.
What do you dislike about the product?
Postman is not open source software, it is a paid proprietary software, I wish someone comes up with an open source version of it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps me manage and control my API development workflow.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If you can not afford postman, you can use chromes debugging tools.
Build custom web products with Postman
What do you like best about the product?
Postman is very easy to set up. It provides quick links to headers, replies, and data regarding debugging. The test manager and the testing factor system saves a lot of time. It really is perfect for checking API endpoint health inspections, monitoring the API performance or error reactions.
What do you dislike about the product?
Compared with the web version, the Plugin is not as robust as I would expect. I would also like Postman to use an external device for UX research, something our project manager has been claiming for a long time.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have used Postman to check our workflows and build custom web products by extending to Micro Products and other fields. It is also used to promote encryption and pre-request texts if current captions are to be created to submit the application. I really like that Postman lets me always explain what JSAN APIs are and get clear information on how they function for people from other parts of the market who do not usually know about APIs.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Postman is suitable for companies that are looking for a tool to check and fix APIs or even simple online apps. This valuable tool has helped me to solve problems with consumers rather than trying to exacerbate problems all the time they appear. Of course if your system does not have a server template or you don't usually communicate with third-party APIs, Postman will not be entirely effective to your group code.
Check small APIs for users
What do you like best about the product?
Postman allows us to handle sophisticated web service management and specific payloads. It includes a good team communication feature too. If you use a trial version, it provides most compatibilities and support for future templates, headings, application bodies, etc. And if you use the paid edition, you can use it for security, so you can protect your user interface on the development API endpoint.
What do you dislike about the product?
Postman fails to incorporate third party for logging and tracking, something that would be very nice to have. Also, Postman accepts mobile application monitoring only web browsers.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Postman is used by most developers of the IT department within our company. The environmental variability setup is a great time saver for us. I particularly like Postman to check small APIs for users, as it allows to evaluate APIs and internet services quickly and easily. It can be used for measuring endpoints positively or negatively, either for measuring their connectivity or for data transmission.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Postman is well suited for checking multiple APIs as it provides fast and broad handling capabilities for managing header and payloads correctly. It is best to use it as a product to reach the user experience. I would frankly recommend Postman for any development company working with any sort of API-based information and communication structure, although it is versatile enough for us to be used in less common situations, but simple enough to provide adjustments for the HTTP exchanges.
Postman as best tool for developers and QE
What do you like best about the product?
I like 4 things in postman:
1. Save and sharing collections.
2.. Automating with pre and postscripts.
3. Variable passing values though different requests.
4. postmand man console and setting to generate code for curl or java
1. Save and sharing collections.
2.. Automating with pre and postscripts.
3. Variable passing values though different requests.
4. postmand man console and setting to generate code for curl or java
What do you dislike about the product?
Variables do not work with xml payload in the collection it though weird errors.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Verifying the service I developed.
Mocking and generating data for upstream and downstream services.
Mocking and generating data for upstream and downstream services.
My views on Postman
What do you like best about the product?
It's robust, lightweight user-friendly API. Integration with other tool is seamless. This tool is pretty much helpful during the development and testing of service requests.
Using this API we are easily able to test complex test cases as well.
Service request history information detail is efficient to check the overall load of received requests and if required then we can send these request again to cross verify the results.
Performs efficient testing of services and performance wise application is good enough and pretty much secure tool.
It's Dashboard is awesome as each item has a sperate section to analyse the actions like collections, history, environments, monitors, mocks etc. so it's easy to use.
Workspace creation process is super simple. It allows to create separate workspaces for Personal and Team use.
In this API collections view is awesome.
Using this API we are easily able to test complex test cases as well.
Service request history information detail is efficient to check the overall load of received requests and if required then we can send these request again to cross verify the results.
Performs efficient testing of services and performance wise application is good enough and pretty much secure tool.
It's Dashboard is awesome as each item has a sperate section to analyse the actions like collections, history, environments, monitors, mocks etc. so it's easy to use.
Workspace creation process is super simple. It allows to create separate workspaces for Personal and Team use.
In this API collections view is awesome.
What do you dislike about the product?
So far it's awesome and meeting our business requirements.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have created automated test cases. Performed load testing through numerous simultaneous requests.
During testing process monitored the service requests nicely.
During testing process monitored the service requests nicely.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It's a stable and secure tool for http requests. Overall efficient test suits.
Postman for API checking
What do you like best about the product?
Postman offers mock databases for your API. It is very easy to manage and the results are quite productive. It makes very simple to write on other languages, as you can handle concise layouts of the integral webservice product life cycle. It enables everyone to quickly and effortlessly add or remove variables and display data in a well-formatted and readable way. It also helps you to save the details so you do not have to check again and again, by grouping demands and handling multiple requests. Postman offers different forms of payloads, such as JSON, and flexible HTTP headers and queries that are organized into lists, placed in databases or inserted into historical records.
What do you dislike about the product?
I wish Postman could have more stronger structured records. Also, POstman can be pretty expensive for most small companies. Also, in comparison to the web version, the Chrome extension version is not brilliant.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use Postman in the IT department for commercial development and API checking. It offers an easy, highly interactive REST server, so we can check many API datasets and monitor the tests of applications and payloads. This is also used for outside third party, when documents are submitted.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Postman is a well suited tool for all those companies that want support in building dumb backends to their web service while focusing in the front end. Tests are simple to run and can be performed by anyone from everywhere.
Great tool for testing every kind of web service and integrations
What do you like best about the product?
You can create any kind of integration you can think of, save them, organize them and is easy to start using it.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes when you need to extract the exact request, it's not easy to know what Postman is adding to it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Testing integrations and web services
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If you need to test services, integrations, webhooks or something related to it, you can use Postman to know if they are working and detect any kind of errors.
showing 621 - 630