Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources

In our organization, the main use case for using Hyperglance  for up to 5,000 sources is to optimize the cost of the cloud by identifying wastage and right-sizing the resources. Apart from that, we also ensure to monitor the security and compliance part with automatic checks and alerts for any kind of violations which may be due to a policy. We also ensure to automate the remediation actions for identified issues. We also improve the efficiency related to operations. Hyperglance  connects well whether it is AWS , Azure , GCP, or Kubernetes  and works well with everything.

Hyperglance has helped us to save on the cost of cloud through waste reduction. We have saved around 38% in cloud cost. Apart from that, it has also helped us to improve the efficiency of the work by enabling real-time compliance checks with around 78% time saving, which was reported by our teams. It has also enhanced visibility and automates the fixing of costly misconfigurations and security breaches, which further boosted our ROI on system failures and technology breaches.

We have been using Hyperglance for quite a while now, but the features which I personally feel are my personal favorites are that it supports a multi-cloud environment. It can work over Azure , AWS , GCP, and Kubernetes  APIs for management unification. Apart from that, it also provides good real-time visualization, interactive diagrams, and dependency mapping for all the resources, which is a great thing. If we are able to map the dependencies at the right time, we are able to identify any issues. It also helps us to automate the recommendations for cost savings, trend analysis, and anomaly detection, which is again a great thing. Codeless automations for fixing common issues and optimizing resources is again a great feature of Hyperglance.

The initial deployment of Hyperglance requires configuration, network access, and permission for cloud APIs, which can be complex for large, multi-account environments. The initial setup and deployment could be a bit challenging.

The setup process of Hyperglance could be easier, and the configuration of network access and permissions for cloud APIs could be done in a more streamlined manner.

The deployment of Hyperglance was a bit tricky as it required network accesses and permissions for the cloud APIs. Our organization had multiple servers and everything was there, so it was a bit challenging for us. That can be improved.

In my organization, we have been using Hyperglance for almost six years now.

Scalability of Hyperglance is good. It can definitely handle enterprise-level traffic.

Hyperglance customer support is very good. We had a word with them three months back when there was an issue with the configuration with one of the systems and they were really prompt and resolved our issue within 45 minutes, which was a very great thing.

I give the customer support a 10 for the customer service.

Positive

Before Hyperglance, we did not use any solutions. This is the first time we have used this solution.

Hyperglance integration is very good. It is getting integrated with other solutions and we do not feel any kind of glitches or connection errors while connecting with other APIs or applications.

We have definitely saved on the time we invested. Operational efficiency increased by 78%. Visibility and automation provided by Hyperglance have helped to prevent costly misconfigurations and security breaches, which further boosted our rate of investment by 38%. We have also saved on cloud cost, around 30% to 35%.

Hyperglance metering and billing experience is a great thing. As Hyperglance is a resource pricing-based model based on the number of cloud resources we are using, in this case up to 5,000, it is not a percentage of your cloud bill. It offers predictable and upfront pricing with no hidden fees, which makes it easy to forecast the cost, and we can easily manage them.

We evaluated other options before choosing Hyperglance. We evaluated CloudHealth  by VMware, Turbonomic  by IBM, Flexera Cloud Management , and CloudZero . Out of them, we found that the cost, security, and the multi-cloud environment is better here, so that is why we chose Hyperglance.

Hyperglance is a great solution to use and it basically gives us this transparency over the billing and other costs, as it is based on the resource-based model. As we fluctuate the usage, we can increase the number of resources and go with that. It also offers a 14-day free trial to evaluate the platform before committing, which is a great thing. I am interested in analyst insights about other solutions. I have provided a review rating of 4 for this solution.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Hyperglance  is known for its excellent visual interactive dashboards that provide a real-time overview of multi-cloud environments, including AWS , Azure , GCP, and Kubernetes , which makes it significantly easier for teams to understand complex deployments and dependencies.

The platform maps all cloud resources, updates diagrams in real-time, and allows comprehensive search and filtering across infrastructure, which is the basic use case of Hyperglance .

Hyperglance can work with both cloud and hybrid environments, supporting reporting across AWS , Azure , GCP, and Kubernetes , making it a game changer.

Hyperglance has helped our team replace the piecemeal solution and tedious manual documentation we used to do. It has also provided us automation for compliance and cost optimization, proving to be a time saver and directly reducing cloud waste.

Our team integrates it into daily workflows, connecting with tools such as Jira  and Slack, serving both technical and compliance stakeholders. The main feature we appreciate is the pay-as-you-go model, accommodating changing infrastructure and sizing up to a 3,000 resource tier.

Customized rule-based automations, such as setting up product rules impacting security, have been beneficial. We have integrated the agentic AI with Hyperglance, assisting with automation and security, quality, and cost control actions.

The best features about Hyperglance include the agentless self-hosted deployment for data privacy and security, real-time interactive visualization of cloud resources, dependency mapping, and inventory or documentation exports in VSDX, PNG, or CSV formats.

It also provides customizable rule-based automations for security, compliance, and cost control actions, which aligns well with my experience in our organization.

Hyperglance integrates seamlessly with other AWS services we use, including S3 , EC2 , and Lambda, as well as tools such as Jira  and Confluence , enabling smooth integration across various functionalities.

Hyperglance is a very good solution. However, it caters primarily to mid and large-sized businesses, and the cost is a bit high for small-sized businesses, which can be a concern. Introducing a version with similar services at a lower price point could be beneficial.

The cost for small businesses is the main concern. Apart from that, Hyperglance serves as a powerful asset for organizations needing visibility, automation, and control access across multi-cloud environments.

I have been working in my current field for more than ten years.

Hyperglance is definitely a scalable product, and I give it a ten out of ten because it can handle growth from mid-size to large organizations.

Hyperglance team provided excellent support, assisting us in the efficient deployment of the system.

I would rate customer support a ten out of ten, as they have consistently provided prompt responses and assistance whenever needed, reaching out within thirty-five to forty minutes in most cases.

Positive

Before Hyperglance, we were using Zesty  Cloud, but we switched due to rigid policies and pricing points.

It was easy to deploy Hyperglance in our environment, as we already use AWS. Hyperglance team provided excellent support, assisting us in the efficient deployment of the system.

The configuration process was straightforward, and we did not encounter any challenges. Hyperglance team provided all necessary documents and instructions, making the learning curve easy to manage.

Hyperglance has provided a good value proposition by saving us time and enabling effective cloud management and security. Compared to competitors such as CloudChecker, CloudHealth , or CloudAdmin, Hyperglance stands out in ROI, visualization, automation, and pricing, saving us seventy-seven percent of our time and thirty-seven percent in costs.

The metering and billing experience with Hyperglance has been excellent, providing a robust pay-as-you-go model where we pay only for the services we require, allowing us flexibility based on our needs, which is an advantage over other platforms.

Hyperglance has helped our organization significantly by providing services on a pay-as-you-go basis, intuitive visualization, robust automation, and real-time compliance monitoring across multi-cloud environments.

Overall, it delivers strong value in cost savings and operational efficiency, offering a competitive model. I give this review a five out of five rating.

Hybrid Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

What do you like best about the product?

Hyperglance provides me with a straightforward, real-time overview of my whole cloud environment without adding unnecessary complexity. I find the visual topology particularly useful, as it enables me to quickly identify issues, grasp how resources are connected, and monitor both security and cost risks. Another aspect I appreciate is its ability to operate across multiple clouds without requiring agents, which simplifies both the initial setup and continued use.

What do you dislike about the product?

At first, the interface can seem a bit overwhelming due to the sheer amount of information displayed on the screen. It takes a while to become familiar with all the features, and the initial learning curve is somewhat steep. I would also appreciate quicker updates to certain integrations, but overall, these are relatively minor concerns.

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Hyperglance allows me to quickly grasp what’s going on across my cloud environments without the hassle of searching through several different consoles. Its automatic highlighting of security and compliance issues not only saves me time but also lowers the chance of overlooking something critical. The visual topology feature speeds up troubleshooting, as I can immediately see how all components are linked. In general, it enhances visibility, cuts down on manual tasks, and helps maintain a cleaner, more secure cloud setup.

What do you like best about the product?

The platform offers real-time data visualizations for cloud resources, making it easier to monitor and understand usage as it happens.

What do you dislike about the product?

The pricing depends on how many cloud resources you use, and at times, you might notice some lag. The interface may be overwhelming in some cases

What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?

Having access to a comprehensive, 3D visualization of the entire IT infrastructure is not just visually impressive, but also extremely helpful for grasping complex relationships and dependencies. It also makes it much easier to identify opportunities for cost reduction.

Positive