My company has around ten AWS accounts, and we use SentinelOne to monitor and see if any risks are there or not in any security groups for VPC endpoints or any other resources that come under severe risk or medium risk, so my company uses the product for calculations concerning the aforementioned area. The tool also creates tickets for our company, which helps us monitor the resources and change them according to the standards applicable to the organization.

The solution's most valuable features are its ability to detect vulnerabilities inside AWS resources and its ability to rescan after a specific duration set by the administrator. It creates a ticket automatically, so you get to know the things in the tool that you need to attend to immediately, making it a core feature of the solution.

I am unsure as to what kind of subscriptions my company has taken from PingSafe. I am not sure about what other things are there in the product that can help our company. Based on whatever subscriptions related to the product my company has taken, I can say that though one of the security groups is open to my company's premises, it still stays that it is open, which, for my company, makes it secure, but for PingSafe, it is not secure, so I am not pretty sure about how it can check and update it. I am not sure if a feature to deal with the aforementioned area already exists in the solution and if my company has not taken a subscription to use it.

Let us assume that there is a ticket that states that one port is vulnerable in the security groups from AWS since it is exposed to the public. When the tool states that it is exposed to the public, it means that it is exposed to the IPs in the company premises and not the public.

Let us assume that there is a database that is exposed to all the IPs in an office. If I have 10 to 12 sets of IPs, I can use them for 10 to 12 Wi-Fi or VPN connections, and it is exposed on the company premises, but the tool states that it is exposed to the public and that the company needs to shut it down. My organization needs to expose the database so that our development team can access it over our office IPs. If you do not expose the database to office IPs, the development team cannot access DBs to manipulate or check data. In general, the database is exposed to the office IPs, not to the public, but the tool states that it is exposed to the public since it cannot identify whether the IP is a public IP or office IP. I am not very sure if there is a setting in the product that allows the office to give its set of IPs to the tool, and scanning can be done through them so that the tool can identify if the resources are inside or outside of the IP range, according to which can state whether it is safe or not. In general, the tool should offer users the ability to mark IPs as public and private ones so that the product can identify them. It would be good if a customer could provide the tool with a set of ten IPs and state that it will be okay and secure if any of the resources are exposed to them since they are inside the office premises.

One of the issues with the product stems from the fact that it clubs different resources under one ticket. If I have 10 resources in 10 accounts, there might be a problem if, from those 10 accounts, 5 resources have the same issues and they get clubbed together under a single ticket, which makes it somehow a difficult process since I have to get inside the ticket to get the resources and the account details.

I have been using PingSafe for 6 months. My company is a customer of the solution.

I never found any stability issues in PingSafe.

In terms of scalability, I have not used the application to its full extent. Right now, I cannot comment on the scalability part of the product.

PingSafe helps identify the resources that are vulnerable to attacks, and if I can fix them up, then my application will be safe at that particular point in time. The tool's aforementioned area has no relation to the product's deployment since it is used to secure my company's resources, applications, and infrastructure.

Though the solution can be deployed with the help of my team, consisting of three people, I can handle it by myself. With PingSafe, the reports come to me, after which I can give or segregate them for different applications while having two different individuals working under me.

I take care of the installation part of the product by myself.

The solution is very user-friendly in terms of ease of use.

I do not use the product's reporting feature because another team in my company handles it. I know that my company uses the product's reporting feature to extract reports on a weekly, bi-weekly, and monthly basis, but I don't deal with it.

I don't use the product's agentless vulnerability scanning. I check the reports that come to me, as I need to further check the resource tests attached to them, especially whatever resources are affected as per the reports. In general, I just go with the report and complete the task.

I have not used Pingsafe's Offensive Security Engine.

Pingsafe's IaC Scanning is a great functionality that is built into the product. It is one of the major functionalities that my company's team uses. With Pingsafe's IaC Scanning, it is easy to monitor and observe areas in a good way.

Pingsafe's IaC Scanning role in identifying pre-production issues in IaC templates or container configuration files is helpful because when in my company, we configure IaC Scanning in our production environment, it gives a brief detail about what the resources and security groups or whatever resources are the most vulnerable, after which they get sorted into four categories, namely, low, medium, high and severe. The tool sorts out the resources into four categories before you go to the production phase, ensuring that they are good and secure.

The main benefit of the use of the product in our company stems from the fact that it provides a vulnerability scanning report, which helps us to maintain the resources mainly, an area for which my team and organization use it.

I experienced the benefits attached to the solution from the first day of using it, and before its use, I was not able to identify the issues in the resources. PingSafe gave me the value and the reports that helped me to identify the issues in resources.

PingSafe's use has helped reduce the false positive rate. In the initial stages, my company had more than 100 severe cases, but within a month, we were able to reduce that to below 10 percent.

With PingSafe, the mean time to detect has reduced because initially, for detection, I had to observe resources end to end. Now, the tool provides me with a regular report because of which I don't need to observe everything inside the resources. I just need to go to a particular resource and check what is stated in the ticket to see which ports are vulnerable, after which it can be changed, so I can directly go and check it, owing to which the tool definitely reduces the mean time to detect vulnerabilities.

With PingSafe, the mean time to remediate is a maximum of twenty-four hours. Initially, in my company, we had to identify the problem and then proceed with remediation, but now we can do it directly since the report is already available.

PingSafe has affected and helped me a bit to deal with the collaboration between cloud security application developers and AppSec teams because it helps me to keep my resources and tell the developers that we cannot expose them to the extent where the application will become vulnerable to attacks. In general, the tool is helpful since it reduces the time needed to connect DevOps and developers.

I found the product to be pretty useful. I directly onboarded the product and started to use it. I did not find any difficulties with the tool.

I rate the tool an 8 out of 10.

We use the solution for security purposes. We deploy it into our infrastructure in the cloud. We want to make sure that all everything is secure, for example,if APIs are getting accessed, that it's by the right people. It's a security hub for us.

The solution is very good at tracing issues.

The dashboard is quite helpful. It's easy to use. The product is flexible and can be used in multi-cloud setups.

It's an easy solution for a beginner.

We've taken advantage of the reporting, which is quite good. It provides us with all the information we need. They have proof of exploitability capabilities, which is important to use.

The solution has agentless vulnerability scanning, which we use. You can look at extra ports. It's a great feature.

Its infrastructure of code scanning is useful. I can see it in the container configuration file. It's good for identifying preproduction issues in the container configuration files. It's working well. However, it's not dynamic. It's static.

We were able to witness the benefits after some time had passed. Within a month or two had passed, we began to really witness change. Previously, we were running blind, and now we can see where things might go wrong.

Our risk posture has improved. Both time to detect and time to remediate have improved.

It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams.

They could have more comprehensive reporting. I'd like to see more details.

We've found a lot of false positives. It has not helped us reduce our level of false positives.

We'd like them to work on integration between networks. If I deployed the solution with another layer of security, they can't talk to each other. PinGSafe basically needs to integrate with more tools, especially on the security side.

I've used the solution for 1.5-2 years.

The stability is good. I haven't noticed any lagging or crashing.

The solution can scale fast. The dependency is on the API side, however.

I've contacted technical support in the past. The quality is good. However, sometimes their staff don't know the details. The speed of response is good.

I have used other solutions, including Prisma and Datadog.

I was involved in the initial deployment of PingSafe. It was very easy to implement. We had two to three people working on the set up process.

There is no maintenance needed for the solution once it is up and running.

I'm a PingSafe customer.

I'd rate the solution 8 out of 10. If someone is looking for a CPSM tool, they should look into PingSafe's capabilities to see if they match what a company needs.

As a financial institution, we rely on SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security as our single source of truth for both CSVM and CWPP data. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provides us with essential security benchmarks, including those for Kubernetes deployments and CSVMs. It also allows us to monitor our overall cloud security posture and identify vulnerabilities for remediation. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security serves as a centralized platform for all our cloud security metrics.

We rely on SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for all our reporting needs. It serves as a comprehensive tool for vulnerability management, ISC management, and reporting on hard-coded secrets. Additionally, it functions as a source for vulnerability identification.

The security engine provides a large vulnerability database. While it's not exhaustive, it's a valuable resource due to its significant size and well-organized data. This database allows for effective security management and vulnerability identification.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's meant time to remediation abilities a 10 out of 10.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helps the collaboration between our cloud security app developers and AppSec team.

The user interface is well-designed and easy to navigate. Our security team relies on it for several tasks. They can use it to retrieve Jira tickets and assign them to the appropriate teams for resolution. This functionality helps them identify and address vulnerabilities efficiently.

I'm not convinced that SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's features offer significant value for our SecOps team. While it might be useful for stakeholders and management to have a tool that aligns with business goals and provides insights, we could potentially achieve this with open-source CSPM tools. In its current state, I don't see SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security directly addressing our specific needs.

While agentless vulnerability scanning is a positive feature, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security lacks the ability to effectively group and customize the provided metrics. This creates a significant limitation, as we cannot easily create the specific metrics that are most useful for our needs. For example, if we want to group a specific set of metrics by a particular label or namespace, there is no straightforward way to do so within SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. The UI offers visualizations for the provided metrics, but it lacks the functionality to segregate and customize them. This inability to create user-defined metrics is a major drawback of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helped reduce the number of false positives in the previous version of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 1.0. Users reported a high volume of false positives with the newer version, and it wasn't clear how SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 2.0 would address this issue. Additionally, users have to manually mute many false positives in SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 2.0, which is a significant drawback.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's mean time to detect ability a 6 out of 10.

While Cloud Security Posture Management tools offer valuable functionality, selling a product solely based on open-source CSPM solutions can be challenging. To differentiate themselves, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security should focus on two key areas: security and workload protection within the CI/CD pipeline. Firstly, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security needs to provide robust security features beyond basic CSPM capabilities. This could involve advanced threat detection and mitigation functionalities. Secondly, workload protection within the CI/CD pipeline is crucial. Here, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security should offer insightful metrics that are well-organized and allow for user customization. This means providing granular control over metric segmentation. Users should be able to define their own metrics and choose how they want them aggregated. Ideally, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security should allow users to import custom metrics and create custom segregations based on their specific needs, such as namespaces or custom levels. For example, if SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security gathers metrics from Kubernetes clusters, users should be able to define their own metrics alongside the pre-defined ones and organize them into relevant categories. This level of customization allows stakeholders to focus on the metrics that matter most to them, potentially reducing the overwhelming volume of data from thousands of records to a more manageable set of hundreds. In conclusion, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security should prioritize UI improvements and offer advanced data segregation capabilities to truly stand out in the marketplace. This will empower users to tailor their security posture management experience to their specific needs.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's current documentation could be improved to better assist customers during the cluster onboarding process. Providing comprehensive documentation with clear and abundant examples would greatly enhance the user experience for new customers. This would empower them to set up their clusters efficiently and effectively.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for 1.5 years.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security seems to be stable, with no reported crashes. However, there's also not a lot of traffic going through the service. It's unclear exactly what SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security does internally.

There aren't many users who actively add technical details to run SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's tools. Additionally, it seems we don't actively incorporate new features. Ideally, clients should share proper answer keys so we can identify if their app crashes.

If we could onboard more users, we could potentially gain access to more resources. However, a recurring issue is missing data. Clients sometimes provide extensions, but clicking on them reveals no information. This lack of data is a significant drawback, even though the system itself seems stable.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is scalable and supports multiple tenancies with no drawbacks.

As a mature organization, we expect a higher level of service from our technical support providers. Unfortunately, we've found that the responses from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's technical support team have been repetitive and not particularly helpful, especially considering the cost of their services.

The initial deployment is straightforward.

It doesn't take more than 30 minutes to deploy SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security into an organization using any cloud platform.

One person can complete the deployment.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's primary advantage is its ability to consolidate multiple tools into a single user interface, but, beyond this convenience, it may not offer significant additional benefits to justify its price.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 5 out of 10.

Our organization primarily relies on our internal scanning tool for IaC security. While many industry tools utilize open-source IaC scanning solutions under the hood, we haven't found significant value in adopting SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's specific IaC offering. This solution might be more beneficial for organizations lacking dedicated SecOps teams, but its additional cost is a factor to consider.

It should transition from an agent-based system to an agentless one. This is crucial because many industry tools are moving in this direction, and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security should follow suit. They should also introduce more features, improve security compliance, and place greater focus on Kubernetes, RBAC systems, and visualization. If they do choose to maintain an agent-based system, they should significantly improve their metric collection capabilities. This would be beneficial because currently, customer response times seem to be slow. By addressing these requirements, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security can ensure continued growth.

We primarily use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for compliance purposes because we work with banks and the fintech industry, so we must follow some standards like PCI DSS.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for compliance and security purposes, and it has helped a lot. We face many audits, and during each audit, we must conduct a vulnerability assessment. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security gives us a list of vulnerabilities that we remediate to raise our compliance score. It's our only tool for vulnerability assessments. The benefits are mostly immediate. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helped reduce the number of false positives, which has been difficult.

We like SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's vulnerability assessment and management features, and its vulnerability databases. The interface isn't too complex. It's quite easy to use. The agentless vulnerability scan is the feature we use the most.

The categorization of the results from the vulnerability assessment could be improved.

We have used SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for 2 years.

I have never faced any downtime.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's scalability is quite good. We have multiple projects, and scalability isn't an issue.

I rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 8 out of 10 based on the features I have used. I haven't used all the features, but I give the vulnerability and compliance features 8 out of 10. I can recommend SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for vulnerability scanning and compliance. There are many competitors, but I find SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security quite good, which is why we haven't switched to something else for the past 2 years.

We use the tool for cloud security management. We check the vulnerabilities in the cloud during the configuration phase using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. We check how many cloud assets are being covered and how many issues have been identified from multiple cloud assets. We check different types of issues. We look into cloud network configuration, Offensive Security, Kubernetes security, and vulnerabilities. We also use the ThreatWatch option to check for active attacks happening worldwide. We can also check compliance, analytics, and asset inventory. We use the tool in multiple locations.

Without the product, we cannot know the configurations and the issues that are present in the cloud assets. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helps us to know such details easily. It guides us and shows the flaws or vulnerabilities present in the cloud assets. It also provides good remediation processes with screenshots. It is easy to tackle and remediate the issues present in the cloud assets.

The solution provides detailed visibility into the security state of the assets and workloads across all the platforms. The remediation process is good. It clearly provides every step required in the resolution with screenshot links. I like it very much. The product helps us identify the misconfigurations and flaws present in our organization. We meet with the concerned teams and resolve the issues. It helps us a lot by finding all the issues in the cloud assets.

We use the solution's agentless vulnerability scanning. There are different categories in the product. It is useful for us that SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security includes proof of exploitability in its evidence-based reporting. It is required for every company that uses clouds. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has helped reduce the number of false positives we deal with. Most of the time, we do not get false positives. It is usually below 10%.

The product has improved our risk posture by 50%. We can detect vulnerabilities faster. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has sped up the process by 80% to 90%. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provides us with the remediation process. It has reduced the mean time to remediate. Without the tool, we wouldn't know the process to remediate. We can get some things on Google, but the product provides the exact process we need to follow. The solution improves the mean time to remediate by 70%. It is a very helpful tool for remediation.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is a collaborative tool. It is very easy to use. Anyone can easily use it. We can easily check the flaws and collaborate with other teams. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has helped us save engineering time by 50%. We use other tools for compliance. We have endpoint security solutions and antivirus products for normal assets. Similarly, we need a tool for the cloud assets. I will recommend SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to everyone who uses the cloud.

Under the containers section, we have a cluster. It is a link between the organization and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. We don't get any notifications from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security when the clusters are down. The SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security database doesn't receive any updates. It doesn't trigger any alerts. We must check things manually. It must be improved in future releases. If notifications are available, then it will be more helpful, easy, and time-saving. We can easily contact the team, check why the cluster is down, and restart things.

I have been using the solution for one and a half years.

The solution is stable. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

We have eight users in our organization. The solution does not need any maintenance. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

The technical support is good. The team responds within 24 hours and resolves all the issues we raise. The team also arranges monthly meetings for updates. The support team educates us about the upcoming updates in the tool. The team helps us if an individual or a team has issues with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. The support people also help us with the remediation process if we are stuck at any stage.

The tool is deployed on the cloud. The deployment can be done in a day. One or two people from our organization and two to three people from the development team of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security were involved in the deployment. The solution was easy to deploy. It was not complicated.

The product has saved us time, money, and resources. We have saved 80% of time, 20% of resources, and 80% of money.

The tool is cost-effective. It is neither cheap nor expensive.

The tool is easy to use. Compared to other products, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is the most easy to use. There are different severity categories, such as critical, high, medium, and low. We get notifications for critical things. Critical issues have the highest priority. The ability to prioritize the issues is helpful for us.

Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

We are using the solution to identify the security vulnerabilities in our AWS infrastructure. Whenever we create a new infrastructure in AWS, if there is a vulnerability, an issue is created in the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security console. There are different severities, such as critical, medium, and high. The product also provides solutions to resolve the issues. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provides a solution document for AWS. It helps us resolve issues. We have seven to eight AWS accounts. It is all in SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security identifies the issues with all the accounts.

Our company has very strict compliance requirements for security. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has helped us resolve vulnerabilities and issues using best practices. It helps us resolve the security vulnerabilities of the AWS cloud infrastructure. The compliance monitoring capabilities are helpful. The tool identifies issues quickly. It gives us the root cause of the security issues rapidly.

The evidence given by the product helps us resolve the issues. It provides a step-by-step guide to resolve issues. It helps us a lot. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provides us with a lot of information. It provides us with a document of AWS. We use AWS CloudFormation. If there is an issue with AWS CloudFormation or if the code is rapidly changing, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security will identify the issue.

The number of false positives depends on the requirements of the clients. If the client needs something for their application and it shows as an issue in SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, we must contact SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and close the issue as an exception. The tool has reduced the false positives by 10%.

The solution helps us maintain our risk posture. We use a web firewall in AWS. If we do not have a firewall in any of the resources, the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security console will identify it as an issue. The tool has helped reduce the mean time to detect. We check the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security dashboard daily. We have a checklist. We can identify how many issues are open and how many issues are closed. It helps us reduce the time to identify the issues and open vulnerabilities. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has helped us reduce our workload and time by 50% to 60%.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helps reduce our mean time to remediate by 70% to 80%. The product reduces workload and time. It is very important in every organization to reduce time and find vulnerabilities. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security also provides us with solutions to the issues. Every organization must have a tool like SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. I will recommend the product to others.

The SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security team identifies issues when we create the infrastructure. Within two to three hours, they create an issue in the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security console. It helps us resolve the vulnerabilities during the creation of the infrastructure. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provides us with documents on how to resolve issues with the infrastructure. It saves our time in identifying issues. Integration with our cloud environment was straightforward.

Based on our application requirements, we discussed some improvement points with the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security team. However, after the new updates, what we asked for was not implemented. The exceptions we requested from the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security team were not included in the console. When we request any changes, they must be reflected in the next update.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The product is stable. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

We have 12 users, including internal users and clients. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

The solution is deployed on the cloud. The deployment takes a few days. Our cloud team and the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security team were involved in the deployment process. We need two to three people for the deployment. The tool does not require any maintenance.

I am satisfied with the technical support.

We save a lot of time identifying vulnerabilities. The product gives us the issue and the solution. It reduces our time and workload.

The tool is cost-effective.

The product is easy to use. My colleague provided me with a KT of the tool. I could learn to use it in two to three days. I understood how to check and resolve issues and segregate them into different severities. The ease of use is very helpful.

Overall, I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for our AWS cloud used in my project and to check the account's vulnerabilities.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has improved our organization a lot. Before using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, we had not covered many points according to vulnerabilities. We have used the solution's dashboard, which shows the criticality of issues, and we have rectified and resolved many issues according to their severity.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has a dashboard that can detect the criticality of a particular problem, whether it falls under critical, medium, or low vulnerability. If it is not a critical problem, we can try to solve it within 4-5 hours. If it's very critical, then we can take action immediately.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security takes 4-5 hours to detect and highlight an issue, and that time should be reduced. Sometimes, the solution shows false alerts. The comments section has also been turned off for the last 10 to 15 days. These are the two issues I'm facing right now in SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for the last three months.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is a stable solution, and I haven’t come across any bugs or glitches.

I rate the solution an 8 out of 10 for stability.

The solution has good scalability. Around 10 users in my team use the solution.

I rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's scalability an 8-10 out of 10.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's pricing is good because it provides us with a solution.

Suppose we find a volume not attached to any EC2 instance during scanning. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security detects such vulnerabilities, and we try to resolve them. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is an easy-to-use solution. Everybody in my team works with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to monitor any vulnerabilities it detects.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is a good tool for security and vulnerability detection for me and my team. The solution is easy to use, and we are very familiar with the dashboard, which shows the criticality of particular problems. It also shows the link to a particular vulnerability or problem so that we can directly go to that particular problem.

Through the solution's dashboard, we can see problems and detect vulnerabilities. Then, we assign each problem to another and try to resolve it. In the pre production environment, we used to try a blue/green deployment. If we try to get any alerts from that particular dashboard, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security will detect them.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has improved our risk posture by 50% to 60%. Earlier, we couldn't identify the things created by mistake during production. If something is created by mistake or if we are unable to detect mistakes in the production environment, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security scans and alerts us of any vulnerabilities.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security takes approximately 4-5 hours to detect an issue. We conducted a test by creating one issue, which was highlighted in the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security dashboard within four to five hours. The issue was still present in the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security scan after we resolved it, and it was removed after four to five hours.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has helped reduce our mean time to remediate, and we immediately take action on the issue. In my opinion, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is really collaborative, and other teams use it at the utmost level. The solution is really helpful for us regarding system security.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has helped us save around 30% to 40% of engineering time. We just see the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security dashboard for issues it has detected and try to resolve them as soon as possible. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has helped us save approximately 30% to 40% of our resources, time, and money.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is integrated with the AWS tool our team uses to detect vulnerabilities. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is a SaaS (Software as a service) solution. We have five to six accounts on SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and use them in multiple locations. The solution does not require any maintenance. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security a 9 out of 10.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to secure our IT infrastructure and fix vulnerabilities. For example, it tells us if our resources have been inappropriately made public. We provision our infrastructure on AWS and GitHub. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security finds vulnerabilities across our entire network and secrets in our GitHub repositories. It also helps us manage our cloud configurations and security groups.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is integrated with Metabolic, Opsgenie, and Slack for notifications. It's also integrated with our security team. They are using a script to correlate the data from SysTrack.

When I joined the organization, we didn't have this kind of security tool in our infrastructure. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helps us secure any resources that were mistakenly made public and other vulnerabilities. Initially, we were primarily focused on projects, not on the security side, but we were dealing with some system vulnerabilities that hackers could exploit, like publicly accessible resources. The detection is highly granular. It gives you small vulnerabilities and very new types.

The SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security team will help you reduce false positives quickly. When we first used SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, false positives were high, so we contacted the team. They did some testing and modifications, and the problem was solved in one or two days.

The mean detection time has drastically reduced. The detection time varies depending on what we're scanning. When we're scanning GitHub, it takes 7 to 10 minutes. On the cloud platforms, it depends on resource availability. It takes 10 minutes on the high end, but the mean is about 1 or 2. Overall, it has been reduced by about 10 percent.

The remediation time is up to us. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security just detects it, but it gives us an assessment and recommendations, making it easier to resolve. When we fix a vulnerability for a particular resource, the issue will not occur again.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security can integrate all your cloud accounts and resources you create in the AWS account, We have set it up to scan the AWS transfer services, EC2, security groups, and GitHub. Using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's evidence-based reporting, we can rank the severity of issues as critical, high, medium, etc. Having the ability to prioritize security issues is crucial for any organization.

One good thing about SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is that it gives you a consolidated view of compliance and vulnerabilities. We can follow SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's guidance and comply with those use cases. When you get an alert, they explain how to resolve those issues.

The user interface is excellent because we see everything in a single panel and can manage all the operations from one portal. It's integrated with Slack, so we can coordinate on the open tickets. We can also mute notifications. The interface is straightforward and easy to use. Anyone can use it.

The offensive security engine is a helpful feature in cases like when a developer leaves some API element exposed, and we can view the potential exploit path. It's helpful when we are deploying any AWS account or service because all our systems depend on AWS. When the service is initially deployed, we can see what happens and get all the details about anything that depends on it.

When you find a vulnerability and resolve it, the same issue will not occur again. I want SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to block the same vulnerability from appearing again. I want something like a playbook where the steps that we take to resolve an issue are repeated when that issue happens again.

We have used SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for more than 2 years.

I rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 9 out of 10 for stability. We've never had any glitches.

We've had no issues with scalability. We've onboarded about 6 or 7. There is no digital investment. You can integrate multiple accounts from various providers.

The support team was valuable during the initial stages. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security contacted us every three weeks. They checked our infrastructure and reviewed all the issues that we were incorporating into the system. They took direct responsibility for the system and could solve queries quickly.

Previously, we were using the native tools of each cloud provider. For example, we used GuardDuty on the AWS.

Deploying SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is straightforward. You can onboard new AWS accounts in five to 10 minutes, and it will start scanning very quickly. They give you a script to run on AWS. You can enroll your accounts based on the template, and it starts collecting data. We onboarded six or seven accounts. It hardly took any time. It's a SaaS solution so we don't need to maintain it. We only need to do the onboarding.

I rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 7 out of 10. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security isn't a unique solution. Other solutions have the same features, but I like SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security because it's simpler to use. It doesn't require any maintenance and the scalability is good. However, I think other solutions can give the same level of detail and insight.