SolarWinds Observability Self-Hosted
SolarWinds | 2024.4Windows, Windows Server 2022 Base windows-server-2022-english-full-base-x86/x.x.x - 64-bit Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
My view on SolarWinds IPAM
What do you like best about the product?
Simplified work process by integrating DHCP and DNS with IP Address Management.
No need for training on DHCP and DNS software.
No need for training on DHCP and DNS software.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it gets complex to move around the GUI of the IPAM.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
First and foremost is no need to maintain reports or documents for the IP addresses assigned or leased.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If you're looking for simplified management of IP addresses then you can go for it.
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
It was very helpful for monitoring and managing your network.
What do you like best about the product?
I think Deep Packet Inspection and Analysis is the most important feature.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think the Dashboard is a little bit crowded and in the first view is confusing but everybody will get used to it very soon.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Network analysis and network monitoring for optimizing awareness for fault tolerance.
Best/great tools
What do you like best about the product?
SolarWinds is the best tool for monitoring. I used these tools with a GNS. It having many services options. Network performance monitor, server and application monitor, database performance analyzer, Service Desk, and the part of the network tools is Network configuration manager.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes its Interface creates confusion.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Network, security events, and network bandwidths Monitoring.
Awesome One
What do you like best about the product?
Ease of use and information which can be saved.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing exactly. But I feel all is very good.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Gud info can be saved and retrieved easily. Like vlan, subnet location, type etc.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Yes, Go for it it will resolve you problems regarding IP subnet information for your entire organization
Solar Winds IP Address Tracker is Awesome and easy.
What do you like best about the product?
Monitor Network with SolarWinds is user-friendly, and its representation is graphical. The Node Details view provides hardware health details and CPU and Memory utilization as well as volume details.
What do you dislike about the product?
Track your IP address for free and not include maxmimum tools for free.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Windows has detected an IP address conflict and Locate the Source of IP Address Conflicting find the problem due to SolarWinds® IP Address Manager.
IPAM
What do you like best about the product?
Organizing IPs in group for site Health .
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes the DHCP utilization doesn't appear to be 100% in sync.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I Was using SolarWinds IPAM to monitor and maintain all of our IP subnets. This prevents overlapping IP addresses and prevents duplicate IP errors in our environment.
Proactive Monitoring
What do you like best about the product?
The simple GUI where everything related to CPU, Disk Space, RAM is displayed in the single page with proper visualization.
What do you dislike about the product?
Unable to integrate the different platforms for monitoring one technology/application
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have been using this for more than 5 years, the first email we receive before an adverse event in any servers is from Solar Winds monitoring only. We were able to analyze different scenarios with the level of detailed analysis provided by Solarwinds. Solarwinds is our primary monitoring tool.
SolarWinds IP Address Manager is a valuable tool for any IT Toolbox
What do you like best about the product?
The SolarWinds IP Address Manager makes it so easy to track what static IP addresses have been assigned to what devices and even what ranges of address are reserved for specific types of devices. It makes organizing my network so much easier since I can properly document my entire IP address map.
What do you dislike about the product?
I wish the SolarWinds IP Address Manager showed the MAC addresses of the devices it finds on the scans. Otherwise, I'm very happy with it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I was looking for a good way to track my reserved IP addresses and ranges and the current devices that are assigned in those addresses and ranges. SolarWinds IP Address Manager solved that problem for me unlike anything else I have been able to find.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
I would highly recommend the SolarWinds IP Address Manager to every IT person that manages a network of devices. It is a valuable tool to document and manage your IP network addressing.
Big on promises, low on anything else.
What do you like best about the product?
The advertised feature list looks solid.
However, when you try to actually use the feature, you realize they are awfully designed, implemented, and rarely work as you expect.
The dashboard can be good if you manage to jump through all required hoops to make it work.
However, when you try to actually use the feature, you realize they are awfully designed, implemented, and rarely work as you expect.
The dashboard can be good if you manage to jump through all required hoops to make it work.
What do you dislike about the product?
First of all, it's just impossible to use effectively if you just want to look into logs as you normally would.
A lot of boilerplate UI around actual messages makes it hard to read logs when it works.
Often it just doesn't load the log and it doesn't seem to due to incidents, it's just how it works in general, unreliably.
If you try to localize the timeframe to filter only relevant messages you will fail too. The UI is just awful.
Alerts - are awful. You cannot have just 1 alert for 1 event, due to their way of implementing & designing this feature alerts always spam you.
Last week I tried to add a user and got an error, the feature just wasn't working at all. And it happens all the time, something just is not right there.
When a prod incident happens and I try to use Loggly to figure it out in about 10% of cases it just doesn't help due to one bug or another.
Sometimes it works though yes. When it does it's just not unusable like I say if you wish to review the log.
We usually just figure out which server generated the error (if we can) and head to the specific server to look into the file log instead of loggly.
The log tail - you cant filter it. Why you'd wonder? Because.
Text search in filtered context - you cant text search in filtered context, because the filtered context loads asynchronously.
So you need to scroll down first, to make filtered context searchable, and scroll down works slow and buggy.
Back-forward navigation in the browser. Due to bad implementation usually, you cannot get back to where you'd expect by pressing back.
Which makes navigation another pain.
The most surprising thing about Loggly is that it's been like this last 5 years, nothing improves.
The role-based access system is awful, it doesn't work as you'd expect. You have to jump through various hoops to make things work as you wish in terms of role-based access to various logs or charts.
A lot of boilerplate UI around actual messages makes it hard to read logs when it works.
Often it just doesn't load the log and it doesn't seem to due to incidents, it's just how it works in general, unreliably.
If you try to localize the timeframe to filter only relevant messages you will fail too. The UI is just awful.
Alerts - are awful. You cannot have just 1 alert for 1 event, due to their way of implementing & designing this feature alerts always spam you.
Last week I tried to add a user and got an error, the feature just wasn't working at all. And it happens all the time, something just is not right there.
When a prod incident happens and I try to use Loggly to figure it out in about 10% of cases it just doesn't help due to one bug or another.
Sometimes it works though yes. When it does it's just not unusable like I say if you wish to review the log.
We usually just figure out which server generated the error (if we can) and head to the specific server to look into the file log instead of loggly.
The log tail - you cant filter it. Why you'd wonder? Because.
Text search in filtered context - you cant text search in filtered context, because the filtered context loads asynchronously.
So you need to scroll down first, to make filtered context searchable, and scroll down works slow and buggy.
Back-forward navigation in the browser. Due to bad implementation usually, you cannot get back to where you'd expect by pressing back.
Which makes navigation another pain.
The most surprising thing about Loggly is that it's been like this last 5 years, nothing improves.
The role-based access system is awful, it doesn't work as you'd expect. You have to jump through various hoops to make things work as you wish in terms of role-based access to various logs or charts.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Consolidating various logs from different machines to one centralized place.
Get alerts if errors happen, watch dashboards of user activity.
Get alerts if errors happen, watch dashboards of user activity.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Consider alternatives, its hard to imagine there are no better options.
Reliable monitoring tool
What do you like best about the product?
Best to track and diagnose alerts and issues pertaining your application or virtual machines.
What do you dislike about the product?
Requires a good amount of prequisites and resources that a normal virtual machine lacks.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We have been using it for our prod environments as per our client requirements to record and investigate issues accross the particular nodes
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Not recommended for beginners.
showing 211 - 220