IBM MQ and IBM MQ Advanced (software)
IBM SoftwareExternal reviews
190 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Reliable ways for data communication
What do you like best about the product?
Reliable source, widely used, libraries and support availabilities
What do you dislike about the product?
Documentation is needed at implementation levels
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Communication
Practice Director
What do you like best about the product?
Available integration capabilities with different platforms. Fast and very reliable communication
What do you dislike about the product?
Coding still needed to enable interactions. Code automation can be further improved for developer and testing community.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Backend integration with legacy systems. This is helping to monetize data through service calls. This is a key function when larger organizations are trying to migrate to faster api led integration stack
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Consider IBM MQ with other IBM web services stack like Data Power
Good Queue System
What do you like best about the product?
Asynchronous messaging, easy to use and integrate
What do you dislike about the product?
When you have a lot of load it could be slow, even you could have deadlocks problems accessing a queue
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Integrating systems, for example legacy systems, core system, web and mobile apps.
Very good integration and gateway tool
What do you like best about the product?
It's a powerful tool to integrate legacy and non legacy systems, with many functions that helps your organization.
What do you dislike about the product?
The support that we are getting from the local provider, check your local support to get the best to it
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
integration and message translation between multiple systems, with and easy handling of a complex infrastructure
Recommendations to others considering the product:
the platform can be a little bit complex when you want to convert it to API solution, but when you use as integration of applications it's wonderful solution with great tools there.
Robust connection and data exchange
What do you like best about the product?
It's availability and robustness. I have rarely seen any outage and unavailability is several year of my experience.
What do you dislike about the product?
Probably nothing, but monitoring and MQ properties visibility can be improved.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Data delivery is very fast and consistent. It is reliable and easy to maintain.
3 Years of active experience using IBM MQ
What do you like best about the product?
Robustness and reliability of the IBM MQ is great feature.
There are lots of MQ product we have in market like MSMQ, Rabbit MQ and many more. But IBM MQ has more command in the market
There are lots of MQ product we have in market like MSMQ, Rabbit MQ and many more. But IBM MQ has more command in the market
What do you dislike about the product?
Support part of IBM MQ can be a area of improvement
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
IBM MQ revamped my project
Before that user had to rework if BI system not available.
Now data can be stored in MQ and we can use it later
Before that user had to rework if BI system not available.
Now data can be stored in MQ and we can use it later
Recommendations to others considering the product:
MQ product can fullfill the need to persistent the data, good product.
Provided a reliable connectivity and transfer of data across multiple systems
What do you like best about the product?
Ease of writing code using COBOL or from Front end and the possible abstraction it provides to developers.
Fail-safe and reliable for high volume production deployments.
Fail-safe and reliable for high volume production deployments.
What do you dislike about the product?
Has to be a bit more user friendly. May be ease of calling or using from scripting language like rexx or ability to write quick stubs..
Should be more easy-to-use test new deployments.
Should be more easy-to-use test new deployments.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Connectivity across systems
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Na
IBM MQ on zos user in Banking firm
What do you like best about the product?
I have been using IBM MQ as a messaging middleware in Banking payment landscape. MQ enables interaction between interfacing system seamlessly. We have been noticed the system resilience and availability since MQ is adopted as a strategic path within the bank. We are a happy consumer.
What do you dislike about the product?
Things for improvement: DPL bridger performance issues.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
MQ keeps the business interaction between systems intact and less maintenance.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It's trusted product line from ibm
IBM MQ is the Backbone of Middleware domain
What do you like best about the product?
IBM MQ is probably one of the oldest middleware solutions provided by IBM. MQ means messaging queuing which essentially works as a transport medium to transport any sort of message or data from source to the destination. MQ has all types of resources like queues, channels, queue manager, process definitions, etc.
IBM MQ can offer you point to point and clustered setup based on your network requirement. If you have only 2 parties where one is the source and the other destination then P2P is more advantageous, but if you have many queue managers and they are interlinked with different services they support then have a clustered setup and establishing a full repository accompanied with few partial repositories would be a good option for you.
IBM MQ is capable of handling the highest security implementations possible. We have upgraded the latest TLS on the system and it was successfully deployed with new cert exchange also happening without any issues. There can also be security at CLN
IBM MQ can offer you point to point and clustered setup based on your network requirement. If you have only 2 parties where one is the source and the other destination then P2P is more advantageous, but if you have many queue managers and they are interlinked with different services they support then have a clustered setup and establishing a full repository accompanied with few partial repositories would be a good option for you.
IBM MQ is capable of handling the highest security implementations possible. We have upgraded the latest TLS on the system and it was successfully deployed with new cert exchange also happening without any issues. There can also be security at CLN
What do you dislike about the product?
IBM MQ has been there forever and they have always tried to perfect it more and more in each version. My biggest concern with the software is the patching process, if you encounter any bug they will give you a temporary solution but you will need to wait till the next patch comes out for that bug to be addressed.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Our whole middleware system is based on MQ interfacing with Websphere message broker and Websphere Datapower Gateway. The beauty of IBM MQ is that it is wire-speed, stable, can not be hacked, non-repudiable, integrity is intact and surity of messaf
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If you are looking for an Enterprise level solution for handling transport of data from source to the destination safe, secure, non-repudiation, intact an
Market leader in Middleware Technology
What do you like best about the product?
IBM MQ is a proprietary software from IBM. We have purchased the Enterprise edition in which you can create as many new queue managers and connections you want. The best part about it is that is the safest option for a message delivery system. It offers you non- repudiation, integrity of the message, checksum and all this is happening at wire speed for literally millions of transactions each day. The software has a bit of learning curve but once you fully understand the functionality, you realise how powerful, stable and fast it is compared to any other competitive products. IBM MQ is the best software available in the market for setting up a new PUB-SUB model or a full & partial repositories clustering model or even a one to one connection queue manager model. I have never seen better resource management that IBM MQ does in the clustering.
What do you dislike about the product?
Well, no complaints from the software as such. But, IBM support team takes a lot of time to respond if you raise a problem ticket to them. We have to open a SEV 1 call bridge to get them on call and that support is very expensive.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I have been working on IBM MQ for more than 5 years now. We have delivered so many projects where the new platform was IBM MQ and they have been going on for ages without any issues, just regular health checks on queue managers and channel connections between them. It integrates so smoothly with IBM DataPower and IBM Message Broker which makes the transportation, orchestration and rendering of the messages so easy to implement.
showing 61 - 70