IBM MQ and IBM MQ Advanced (software)
IBM SoftwareExternal reviews
190 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Ibm Mq feedback
What do you like best about the product?
We have been using a Mq for almost 20+ years and we have some latge infra with almost around 10,000+ Queue mangerst jso it’s a big big deal infrastructure for Support sake critical applications
What do you dislike about the product?
The challenge is that the cloud applications
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Persistence asynchronousguaranteed delivery
Key tool for messaging and one to look at even as you move to new technology stacks
What do you like best about the product?
MQ has kep space with the times moving into cloud based (both private and public cloud) environments and is still a key tool in managing messaging between apps and environments.
What do you dislike about the product?
Setup and configuration is still painful but increasingly easy with scripts and setups on the cloud management platforms.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Still the key messaging protocol between our legacy mainframe and also new apps being developed.
messaging backbone
What do you like best about the product?
Robust security features
strong features for on-premise enterprise ready messaging
extending features to include connectivity for cloud-native apps and container-based deployments
strong features for on-premise enterprise ready messaging
extending features to include connectivity for cloud-native apps and container-based deployments
What do you dislike about the product?
complexity of configuration for apps on non-IBM Cloud infrastructure
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
HA, resilient healthcare messaging
messaging backbone for ACE and IIB - robust Pub Sub and connectivity
strong support for security
evolving mechanisms for HA and DR
messaging backbone for ACE and IIB - robust Pub Sub and connectivity
strong support for security
evolving mechanisms for HA and DR
Recommendations to others considering the product:
the first implementation is not a steep learning curve
getting Security and HA integarated with existing or emerging Enterprise infrastructre can take some time and resources and iterations
getting Security and HA integarated with existing or emerging Enterprise infrastructre can take some time and resources and iterations
MQ Message Queue
What do you like best about the product?
Functional rich and easy to use; integration with lots of tools.
What do you dislike about the product?
Takes sometime to understand, but better than open source RabbitMQ
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Messaging Infrastructure for our EDI applications
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Very well recommended
MQ at RJ
What do you like best about the product?
Very mature and stable, applicance has improved DR and HA capabilities.
What do you dislike about the product?
Not great instrumentation out of the box
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Moving asycnronous data across differnt platforms
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Large enterprises with need to keep persistent messages should look into the applicance
MQ Review
What do you like best about the product?
Easy of installation and use. Flexibility. Fast start stop
What do you dislike about the product?
Lack of detailed logs without starting traceing
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mq is takling to BPM, WAS, portal and BD2 in our agency's infrastructure.
VEry reliable
What do you like best about the product?
We use MQ to transfer hundreds of millions of messages reliably over zOs, Unix/linux and windows. 100+ application areas use MQ for both app to app messaging and for db2 replication. We have been using MQ for over 20 years.
What do you dislike about the product?
There isn't a great deal of issues that we have. probably an easy to use monitoring and alerting tool would be more useful.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
data replication, app to app messaging.
Messaging Master "MQ"
What do you like best about the product?
MQ - ease of use , guranteed delivery , no failures , stable prodcut
What do you dislike about the product?
not up to the mark specific to cloud native
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
for real time and batch messaging without message loss
Recommendations to others considering the product:
ease of use , gurentted delivery , no failures and compatible with mnost of leading produts and clouds
Integration Architect
What do you like best about the product?
Wide platform support to integrate almost any-to-any
What do you dislike about the product?
Did not transform with the industry to support API. Now enterprises are using MQ, but are forced to build custom application layers or use additional products like Datapower and such to provide http endpoints.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Integration into legacy M/F applications and thus leveraging core business apps developed earlier.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
IBM should help existing investment to be useful
IBM Product Review for MQ
What do you like best about the product?
Easy to use light weight, easy deployment and redundancy
What do you dislike about the product?
too expensive, should be able to compete with Rabbit MQ... and not make it as IIB
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
File transfers between internal apps
showing 91 - 100