HAProxy Enterprise Ingress Controller
HAProxy TechnologiesExternal reviews
581 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
I have been using HAProxy since several year
What do you like best about the product?
HAProxy is quite simple to configure and easy to use as light weight app
What do you dislike about the product?
The HAproxy monitoring UI is not that much good.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Making cluster of different kind of services
Works out of the box
What do you like best about the product?
Being lighweight, low footprint load balance which can be used to balance a web app, APIs, database connections and more.
What do you dislike about the product?
Configuration examples can be added apart for it cant think of any right now
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Used it for load balancing web app
Load Balancing with HAProxy
What do you like best about the product?
The best part which i like most in Haproxy
1. Health Checks
2. Backend Weight
3. Rewrite Rules
4.Security Implementation
5. Application-Based DDoS and Bot Protection
6.ACL, Map, and TLS Ticket Key Synchronization
1. Health Checks
2. Backend Weight
3. Rewrite Rules
4.Security Implementation
5. Application-Based DDoS and Bot Protection
6.ACL, Map, and TLS Ticket Key Synchronization
What do you dislike about the product?
There are only few things which i don't like is the Configuration part, all we have to configure by our own.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I am using HAProxy to solve the issues like adding Weight in Backend on the basis of GEO Location, Session Sticky Ness, CORS Implementation.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Very Good tool who are looking to solve their loan balancing issues.
HAProxy was here in the beginning and will be here in the end.
What do you like best about the product?
HAProxy is fast. It doesn't aspire to do more than that. It's a fast TCP proxy with Layer 4 and Layer 7 functionality that makes it useful in a range of environments where you want functionality without bloat. Focus without compromise.
What do you dislike about the product?
Because it's specialized, it's entirely possible to overlook what it's good at. Other solutions offer a toolbox of features, but by doing so, are they excellent at any one of them? My experience with HAProxy has always been that I could rely on it to do what it needed to do, where I needed it done, and I knew that once deployed, it would work tirelessly. I've never had HAProxy fail in the 10+ years I've been using it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use HAProxy in front of Kubernetes clusters, either to load balance traffic to the ingress controller running on multiple nodes, or to load balance the Kubernetes API for HA clusters. I also punch TCP ports through it, do SSL termination on it, and use it for elaborate URL and header rewrites for applications that have been wedged into multiple containers but weren't designed to be carved up like that. Having a load balancer present in my environment makes it easy to use it as the frontend for all sorts of applications, giving them stable, friendly DNS names and running them as HTTPS apps instead of bizarre HTTP apps on port 3000 or 8080 or other random ports.
showing 201 - 204