The solution is used to automate internal operations. We had industrial and equity-based financial clients.
Appian Platform
AppianExternal reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
A true low code platform
Great Product, weird license model
APPIAN is great but takes some time to get used too.
My experience with Appian
Flexible, improves operational efficiency, and reduces the time taken to complete processes
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
The product improved our operational efficiency. The deployment takes one or two weeks. The rollout takes two to three weeks.
What is most valuable?
The solution’s turnaround time for development is better compared to other tools. The solution enables fast development. The traceability of the processor is good. There is much more governance and regulations on the processers. The tool reduces the time of the processes by 30% to 40%. The solution’s low-code aspect has greatly impacted the development and deployment speed.
One of the major reasons we are using the product is that we can reuse the modules. The developers can reuse all the modules. It enables us to make subsequent developments in less time. The prebuilt modules can be deployed within two to three weeks. The tool is very flexible. Compared to other platforms, the Appian product team was agile in quickly customizing things for us.
What needs improvement?
It is difficult to set up the on-premise version.
For how long have I used the solution?
I used the solution for more than three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable. I've never faced any downtime. The response time is also great.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is easy to scale up the product for a large number of users. We can scale up to 100 users within 20 to 30 minutes. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. Our customers are enterprise businesses.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is not excellent, but it is good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of the cloud version is quite easy. I rate the ease of setup of the cloud tool a nine out of ten. It is difficult to set up the on-premise version. I rate the ease of setup of the on-premise tool a five or six out of ten.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The tool is quite costly. It's not affordable to the general public and most companies. People would prefer a low-cost version that comes with reduced functionalities. The solution would be more accessible to the users if the vendor provided it at half the cost. I rate the pricing eight and a half out of ten. The price is quite high.
What other advice do I have?
I haven't faced challenges with new implementations. If an organization has a long-term goal of automation and wants to explore automation, Appian is a good choice. The product is quick, agile, and very robust. It provides everything we need. It's not like the other platforms where we have to buy multiple things on top of the actual product. It is a holistic automation tool. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Creating user interfaces is highly productive when these interfaces are integrated with the original database
What is our primary use case?
Appian is a platform that focuses on human-centric workflows around processes. It facilitates requests for policies or incidents involving groups of people. The application manages the workflow between individuals to negotiate and confirm these policies.
How has it helped my organization?
Appian is managed and upgraded regularly.
What is most valuable?
The most productive aspect of Appian lies in its ability to develop interfaces, particularly user interfaces. Creating user interfaces is highly productive when these interfaces are integrated with the original database. In such cases, using record types proves to be a very efficient method of handling data. The synergy between interfaces and record types enhances productivity.
What needs improvement?
The case management studio is still immature, but it looks very nice. However, the VPN should be improved. The case management system needs improvement, but it has some promising features. Appian has the commitment to continuous improvement. With each new release, they enhance the platform for all users.Currently, making changes requires too much backend development work. They're working on streamlining this process, particularly with VPN integration. As it stands, storing everything in memory doesn't effectively handle large datasets. Transitioning VPN processes to a more traditional database approach would greatly improve scalability and usability in real-world scenarios
When the sentences are too long, they become difficult to manage. The scalability is low, when they become complex. The integrations are fine. There are some minor errors and details, but it does a great job in explaining errors within Appian. Internally, there is much information to help you understand what's going on, but not always. Sometimes, it's difficult to know what's happening, but these instances are rare.
Architecturally, there is an issue with Appian that it tends to put all the applications in the same infrastructure. Big customers resort to having several installations of Appian to deploy different applications in different infrastructures. They face the problem of managing assignments. Appian should make it easy to deploy different applications in separate infrastructures. Additionally, there needs to be a way to unify them because without using VPN, users are left without a unified inbox. Applications can't use the VPN and have to resort to their own solutions to show users their work, leading to inconsistency. Since each application is different, it becomes crucial to have a centralized point where users can find their work. Even if the applications are split into different installations, there needs to be a single way for users to find all their work.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Appian for two to three years. We are the using V24 of the solution.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution's stability is better.
I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is difficult to scale. 1,000-2,000 users are using this solution.
I rate the solution’s scalability a six out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used SoftEther VPN.
How was the initial setup?
I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.
What about the implementation team?
The platform was set up by third party.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is expensive.
I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated Outsystems. Appian is much proactive to create solutions applications.
What other advice do I have?
The most frustrating aspect is its DPM offering. It fails to support VPN due to its limited scalability. You can only use the VPN for isolated cases. When attempting to apply it in a real-world scenario with multiple applications, it becomes unusable due to its lack of scalability. It boosts everything into memory.
It is very easy to develop interfaces and access data with Appian. The local code acts as a communicator. The interfaces function as record types, and the logic you program use special rules, which resemble a kind of functional language exclusive. This combination of user interfaces and record types, along with the special rules, is very productive. You typically need to write much less code compared to other platforms
Intergration is good.
I recommend the solution, One should evaluate the VPN needs very closely. Not everybody needs VPN, but those who do should take a closer look to avoid surprises. You can use VPN in Appian, but it's somewhat different from what you might expect.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Appian. Path to hyper automation
Refined data fabric layer
Addition of process mining and RPA
Evolving platform
Easy, quick development for the right use cases
On the development side, it allows rapid iteration and deployment.
Strong workflow solutions
Host it on kubernetes relatively simply
About Appian
Appian also excels process automation, streamlining complex business workflows. Im my opinion, this capability enhances operational efficiency by automating repetitive tasks and ensuring a smoother flow of processes. This not only saves time but also reduces the likelihood of errors in critical business operations.
Limited Customization in UI: Although Appian offers tools for designing user interfaces, some of my clientes have mentioned limitations in terms of highly customized and intricate UI designs. Depending on specific design requirements, users may find the options somewhat restrictive.