Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Neo4j for ontology based KB generation
What do you like best about the product?
I've used neo4j for ontology-based KB generation task. So far, I have found neo4j graph-based data representation to be the best fit for such tasks. Apart from that, neo4j easy to learn and operate with.
What do you dislike about the product?
Neo4j master-slave architecture, writes are always done on master. Overall write-performance issues relative to SQL databases. Garbage collection pauses.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I've used neo4j for the ontology-based KB generation task. The knowledge base consists of health care data with ontology representation as disease, symptoms, medication, organ/part of body associated etc along with their respective data and their relationship with each other. applying different graph-ml algorithm (like decision trees) on available data in graph to get a good accuracy of diagnosis. This also focuses on Knowledge Validation, Inferencing and Explanation/ Justification process of knowledge Engineering to maintain our healthcare knowledge base. Currently, we do not have CCDA’s available with information of symptom of patients (chief complaint, the reason for visit, etc.). For the time being, we are collecting data from online sources and will use that to symptom-based disease diagnosis.Healthcare KB generation of clinical data using cTAKES NLP and Neo4j.
As name of the project suggests "all men must serve", demo code of the project is available publically in the link. So far, I have found neo4j graph based data representation to be the best fit for such tasks.
As name of the project suggests "all men must serve", demo code of the project is available publically in the link. So far, I have found neo4j graph based data representation to be the best fit for such tasks.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If you think your problem can be solved by graph based data, neo4j is worth a try
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
Rich community, robust and scalable
What do you like best about the product?
Very good interactive UI. very efficient on large datasets to support the multiple relations between the nodes.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes hard to visualize complex data analyses. Automatic backups could be improved
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
IoT device simulation and visualization.
Neo4J review
What do you like best about the product?
I like a lot trying to improve graph language
What do you dislike about the product?
For a moment now all thing that I like a lot
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It's helping to build fast graph databases
Easiest way to find connections in a schema-free database
What do you like best about the product?
Finding paths between nodes and doing what sql cannot
What do you dislike about the product?
Import function from csv files; creatina connections with cypher language
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Finding connections between data that where non treatable with traditional sql queries
Build large multi-property objects
What do you like best about the product?
In Neo4J, the various interactions between nodes are very effective in large databases. Processes are special keys that can be introduced into Neo4J to allow specific software requests or integration with Java operations. Also, UI client credentials restricted access enables for nicely controlled access. Neo4J is really helpful when it comes to solving the Cypher scripting language's limitations.
What do you dislike about the product?
Even the graphical display of the less advanced data set is nice, but it is not nice for a complex information set with over ten probable relationship charts. Also, you must use Neo4J native API, as it does not cooperate with any other open source APIs. I would specially like it to be integrate with BluePrint.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Neo4J is a good choice for us to examine and create a relationship modules. It allows us to build large multi-property objects, consume them at competitive prices, scan for the map and display results quickly enough for you to actually operate the site from them. As the software is entirely materialized, both joints are assembled in frequent time, which significantly improves database quality without requiring additional software development.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Neo4J is suitable for companies where matching information patterns is important and when data scanning constantly required. The use of Neo4J facilitates effective information processing and the capacity to search using Cypher. However, Neo4J is probably not really the most effective solution if you have deep requirements to search for individual nodes and their related data.
Speed up your business growth with Neo4J
What do you like best about the product?
Neo4J is a very fast software. It offers support for REST API, which allows for a simpler and quicker communication with Neo4J. Also, it offers a fantastic free version for the community that works with small projects. In general, Neo4J offers a wonderful user experience for every kind of data study you perform.
What do you dislike about the product?
The aggregation request needs a better support, as right now it is deficient. To be honest, I think most of the Neo4J issues comes with the support, so the solution would be to improve it. Also, I think Sandboxing should be easier too, as the process is unnecessarily complicated. If you work with a JSON data framework, it can not be changed into a graph.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Neo4J introduces the foundation for our web host to collate supply chains of businesses. It is used by the development team of our IT department, but it benefits the entire company, as it allows us to speed up our business growth. Neo4J also involves more than a dozen node-to-node connections, which makes it perfect to be our primary software server.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Neo4J is very good for POC and research purposes, even for very active querying language for database information in certain large databases. It is a good alternative option, as it's a challenging and expensive process to design this sort of information with a conventional SQL database. However, this is less ideal for any data structure different to graphs.
Build your information map with Neo4J
What do you like best about the product?
Neo4j has a very straightforward and simple to use Cypher language. This Cypher is quite good if pattern matches on the introduction of interesting ideas. It makes us replicate our thoughts even better, because the way we think of information is a very simple, with just nodes and connections and Neo4j helps us to show it exactly how it is. Also, Spark controls are used to do ML or more computer work, and you can boost file backups.
What do you dislike about the product?
The language framework support currently is only available on Java libraries. I would like to see more variety on this field.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use Neo4j to build our information map as a database system with no schema. We wanted a solution that could manage highly complicated queries without sacrificing quality, and Neo4j actually tackles these challenges. I evaluated it and compared it with similar usage cases and found that Neo4j performance was what we needed. The system was built to assign a node or an edge for each bit of information, so we did not have to use some kind of link server or any database without SQL.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Neo4j is very useful for every enterprise concerned with complex and intertwined information. Also, it is suitable if you have your information represented as a graph, in nodes or edges, and if your network attributes are of concern to you. Nonetheless, it's not a good option if you need to work with a large, complex data collection.
Easy to use Graph database
What do you like best about the product?
It is very easy to understand. Follows ACID properties without lot of complexity. Stores relations and nodes separately. There is no table structures. One of the best part is it's CYPHER querying language. Cypher language is easy to understand and easy to follow. For new learners it is quite simple to follow, and once can easily start working with Graph database with good standards.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing to dislike, however in the initial level it is bit confuses for understanding, later it is very good to follow.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Initial level understanding the query flow is bit confusing, if we follow documentation step by step will get clear picture and clarity about CYPHER and other concepts. Practice examples made it very easy to learn and getting started with Graph Database
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Try to implement upcoming projects with Neo4j, if you have performance as top priority. Forget about joins and other complex queries. Just use relations to find out related data. Very easy to query different levels of data. Easy to understand relations and nodes and labels. Cyphar language is one of the best advantage of Neo4j. It's unique bolt protocol is most secure and easy to transmit the data. Security is top priority in Neo4j, Data in transit and data in rest both are encrypted with good encryption standards. Also supports lot of programming languages. It provides Java, .Net, Python and Javascript libraries out of the box. Also supports lot of other programming languages with the help of community support.
The best NoSQL Graph Database
What do you like best about the product?
What fascinates me about this product is the graph. I did not know there is this such kind of database where you can visualize the entities(table) by looking into the graph see their relationships. You can also easily define the edges(relationships) to point their relationship to other entities.
What do you dislike about the product?
When your graph includes a lot of entities, the graph will get bigger and bigger.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
What we are solving with Neo4j is how to optimize queries. RDMS is a robust database, but when you are thinking of optimizing your queries, consider using Neo4j.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
You must try Neo4j to optimize your queries
Neo4j is an awesome NoSQL Graph Database
What do you like best about the product?
What I like about this NoSQL database is that nodes are presented in a graph. You can later add on relationships and define the schema.
What do you dislike about the product?
Education Resources should be widely available aside from the training and documentation available onsite.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We are trying to experiment on how to migrate our databases and adapt to a NoSQL graph database.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
More resources and training online.
showing 91 - 100