Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Amazin tool for an amazin team!
What do you like best about the product?
We deploy two countries with Codefresh.
It's very easy to play with it to deploy in Kubernetes and Helm clusters.
He helps use to manage some Helm release in our cluster easily.
We love the powerful system of pieplines.
It's possible to create a global pipeline to trigger some others pipelines.
For example ; we have a French and a Spanish countries and when we want to deploy on each countries, we just trigger the global pipeline that triggers parallelly the two others, FR and ES.
All of our pipelines are stored in a Git repository and it's easy to manage pipelines.
We have a trigger on each pipeline to re run the jobs when the pipeline is changed.
It's very easy to play with it to deploy in Kubernetes and Helm clusters.
He helps use to manage some Helm release in our cluster easily.
We love the powerful system of pieplines.
It's possible to create a global pipeline to trigger some others pipelines.
For example ; we have a French and a Spanish countries and when we want to deploy on each countries, we just trigger the global pipeline that triggers parallelly the two others, FR and ES.
All of our pipelines are stored in a Git repository and it's easy to manage pipelines.
We have a trigger on each pipeline to re run the jobs when the pipeline is changed.
What do you dislike about the product?
A simple clean dashboard to rollback for our developpers.
Because, the view to rollback is very complex for a bew young developper.
I think that a simple button to rollback is no a very feature to add to Codefresh because this feature aleardy exists.
Because, the view to rollback is very complex for a bew young developper.
I think that a simple button to rollback is no a very feature to add to Codefresh because this feature aleardy exists.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We love our CI part but unfortunately for the CD part we had nothing... Until the amazing was Codefresh arrive!
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Let's go guys! It's an amazin tool and I'm sure that you're not disappointed.
The tool is fun and cool and the team is very acceccible.
I recommend because even the pricing is fair. The platform is stable and we had never problem.
The system of mounting file or directory is a very good and practice idea.
The tool is fun and cool and the team is very acceccible.
I recommend because even the pricing is fair. The platform is stable and we had never problem.
The system of mounting file or directory is a very good and practice idea.
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
Works well most of the time
What do you like best about the product?
Lots of freedom to define steps in a pipeline, easy to create alerts, good integrations (github, slack). Can reuse pipeline definitions through YAML specs.
What do you dislike about the product?
Occasional failures can interrupt vital CI/CD pipelines. Sometimes steps fail without a clear cause, restarting them seems to work but false negatives can cause distraction.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
CI/CD pipelines scale seamlessly. Once you're set up, it's extremely easy to add new projects and different types of pipelines.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
A definite improvement over a self-hosted automation solution. Lots of flexibility, good documentation ant out-of-the-box integrations.
Awesome easy to see builds and stages in real time
What do you like best about the product?
Build steps, easy configuration files and implementation
What do you dislike about the product?
SSO Login with other button and without to say to push it
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Builds for code review and testing
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Easy build steps, configuration and implementation
Codefresh enabled us to be very flexible and adaptable with our pipeline setup and processes.
What do you like best about the product?
Codefresh doesn't have a single way of setting up the CI. You can set it up and get it running how you want, you can run steps in parallel, or you can run them synchronously, or you can do both. You can trigger other pipelines from the current pipeline and act on their success or failure status.
What do you dislike about the product?
The only self-hosted runner option requires kubernetes.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We're solving our need for a robust and flexible CI/CD pipeline. We got this happily from using codefresh.
Fabulous experience
What do you like best about the product?
High-quality support service with an extremely professional attitude
What do you dislike about the product?
I would like to see more features like support for custom manifests on Kubernetes or Ingress support
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
CI, CD container registry, helm charts as well as Kubernetes management. Friendly UI and "one-stop-shop in general".
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Best choice for modern Devops engineers
A Solid CI/CD Platform
What do you like best about the product?
The code is, and I do not say this lightly, very fresh, and thus delivers on the name.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is nothing that I could say that I dislike about CodeFresh, it's my reason for going to bed and night and my reason for getting up in the morning, it is my muse and it is my flame. What could be better?
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is a solid CI/CD platform.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Just do it
Fun to Use
What do you like best about the product?
The ease in building and using containers.
What do you dislike about the product?
The web interface is a little too fast to push you to upgrade to larger instances.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We needed to build and test containers for a Kubernetes environment. We implemented easy to understand build scripts.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Read the documentation on how to structure builds.
Love CodeFresh for our CI/CD!
What do you like best about the product?
The ease of use, setup, and simple integration with our AWS ECR Docker containers. Deployment is simplified across our environments.
What do you dislike about the product?
So far everything has worked very well, no dislikes to mention at this time.
The only question we have might be cost vs Github Actions.
The only question we have might be cost vs Github Actions.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Simple Git Ops type of flow that allows us to deploy when we push to specific branches and also allows steps for approval before deployment is triggered.
Codefresh solves one of the most challenging issues with running CI/CD pipelines - usability.
What do you like best about the product?
Apart from a stunning and easy to use UI and packed with tons of features, we liked how Codefresh works with containerization and Kubernetes in mind. Another helpful capability was the ability to define custom steps that can be reused in numerous pipelines. That significantly simplifies building custom pipelines (especially if following GitOps like pattern).
Even though Codefresh was very well documented, we also got tremendous help from support. The team was very responsive, both for the free and paid plans.
Even though Codefresh was very well documented, we also got tremendous help from support. The team was very responsive, both for the free and paid plans.
What do you dislike about the product?
Hard to answer. Codefresh was the choice for CI/CD pipelines for two of my projects.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Running end-to-end CI/CD pipeline to build, run automation tests, deploy product versions.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Definitely worth a try! Works well for us.
Most Streamlined CI/CD Platform for Containerised Applications
What do you like best about the product?
After searching and evaluating a number of different platform for CI/CD we discovered Codefresh to be the most cost effective, easy to use and customisable for all our workflows. With a direct Kubernetes API integration, we can control each cluster directly from the Codefresh dashboard. This has provided us with a faster feedback on making some quick changes like increasing replicas. The Helm Dashboard that allows for easy Helm control such as visibility of which revision is deployed to managing rollbacks makes Codefresh a far superior platform to work with.
When running the workflows it is important that we have an easy and flexible system to manage environment variables. Codefresh not only allow easy pipeline editing the variables but also the ability to share variables among projects and pipelines.
Some of the best features are -
- Multiple Environment Workflows
- Shared Environment Variables
- Exportable Variables
- Customisable Steps
- Kubernetes API integration
- Unified Log Output
- Easy rollbacks with Helm dashboard
When running the workflows it is important that we have an easy and flexible system to manage environment variables. Codefresh not only allow easy pipeline editing the variables but also the ability to share variables among projects and pipelines.
Some of the best features are -
- Multiple Environment Workflows
- Shared Environment Variables
- Exportable Variables
- Customisable Steps
- Kubernetes API integration
- Unified Log Output
- Easy rollbacks with Helm dashboard
What do you dislike about the product?
It would be nice to be able to split the users into teams with better granular RBAC settings. At present all users have access to all projects. Having user groups attached to projects would give more security control to team leaders.
At first we used Codefresh for both CI & CD but we discovered that Github actions was was much faster at building, running and testing our code than Codefresh was so we recently opted to use GitHub actions for all CI and just use Codefresh for CD.
At first we used Codefresh for both CI & CD but we discovered that Github actions was was much faster at building, running and testing our code than Codefresh was so we recently opted to use GitHub actions for all CI and just use Codefresh for CD.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Every application is different, every deployment has quirks and every environment should be different. Codefresh gives us the ability to configure every single application, environment and deployment to suit the project's needs while delivering a consistent workflow to the developer.
Previously we used a niche system that allowed us to build developer based development environments from a GitHub pull request. We originally wanted to locate and replicate this functionality in a new CI/CD platform and after finding Codefresh we discovered we could do way more that this. We have a custom Cloudflare step that allows us to create a new CNAME of our domain for each environment that is built from the project-branch-environment name. This provided us with a faster QA feedback loop & cleaner sharable URL's in a completely destructible environment.
Previously we used a niche system that allowed us to build developer based development environments from a GitHub pull request. We originally wanted to locate and replicate this functionality in a new CI/CD platform and after finding Codefresh we discovered we could do way more that this. We have a custom Cloudflare step that allows us to create a new CNAME of our domain for each environment that is built from the project-branch-environment name. This provided us with a faster QA feedback loop & cleaner sharable URL's in a completely destructible environment.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Highly recommend. You should at least try it and you will find it a much better system that some of the competitors.
showing 51 - 60