Users appreciate straightforward installation and rapid updates with excellent community support
What is our primary use case?
My main use cases for Ubuntu Linux include web servers, FTP servers, and DNS servers, mainly for server usage.
I am mainly using Ubuntu Linux in a virtualized environment; it is virtualized even on-premises, and obviously, in the cloud, it is virtualized. I typically do not install it as a bare-bones or direct install.
For the cloud, we are using Ubuntu Linux on AWS and internally, we are using it on VMware vCenter.
About half of my office, which is around 25 users, works with Ubuntu Linux. However, for the cloud application or workflow that we publish, we have around 300,000 users.
What is most valuable?
The features of Ubuntu Linux that I find most useful and beneficial are the automatic Yum update repository and making software updates easy.
There are automatic update repositories in Ubuntu Linux.
Regarding the specific scenario where security features of Ubuntu Linux have impacted my operations positively, I don't think there's any specific instance, but the main aspect of Ubuntu Linux is that the updates in terms of security are very fast, and it is very easy to deploy. This would be defined as a positive outcome.
What needs improvement?
I recommend improving Ubuntu Linux's version upgrade process. The community has provided support with a community repository that would upgrade the particular version for you, but I don't see that as a paid subscription or paid support from Ubuntu Linux.
Increasing the legacy support for older software would be a good improvement for Ubuntu Linux in the next release.
The problem with the license costs for Ubuntu Linux right now is due to currency exchange, as everything is based on US dollars. If the support could be priced locally and fixed for a number of years, it would be better. The fluctuations of the US dollar and global economic uncertainty make it difficult, but if they could lower the price by about 10%, it would be significant for developing countries like Malaysia.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Ubuntu Linux for more than five years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
I do not face a lot of issues integrating Ubuntu Linux with my existing infrastructure, as it is quite popular as a Linux distribution. However, the versioning can sometimes confuse people between the LTS version and the standard version, and this is where problems happen because they're not using the long-term support (LTS) version.
The issue with the version is that some applications become deprecated or no longer supported, which can lead to situations where updating or upgrading certain applications might break them. For example, I was using WordPress, but when I upgraded to a newer version of Ubuntu Linux, WordPress broke due to the fact that some of the components are updated and WordPress itself doesn't support the updated application yet.
Apart from this challenge, I have not faced any other problems; in terms of operating systems, Ubuntu Linux is quite easy to use and has a lot of documentation. The only problem arises during major version upgrades when some non-Ubuntu applications might not work after the update.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I don't have any advice or input on making Ubuntu Linux more stable, as I find it very stable. I've installed it in the cloud, on-premises, and in my own virtual machine.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We are planning to increase the usage of Ubuntu Linux in the future while also evaluating the use of Amazon Linux.
How are customer service and support?
For technical support, I would give it an eight out of ten because I don't really need to rely on their technical support; most of the information is available in forums or the public domain.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We are exploring Amazon Linux because it's on Amazon, and running its own version of Linux might provide additional benefits that we can gain; that's why we are conducting this study.
How was the initial setup?
Ubuntu Linux is very easy to set up for me personally.
I would probably rate the setup experience of Ubuntu Linux an eight or a nine out of ten.
It takes about 15 minutes for the basic install of Ubuntu Linux and another half an hour for the updates.
What other advice do I have?
I expect that if there are loyalty discounts, such as if there is some program for long-term users, that would be great, but they currently don't have such a program.
There should definitely be a loyalty program for long-term users of Ubuntu Linux.
I am not informed if Ubuntu Linux supports any AI-driven projects, as I don't visit the Ubuntu website often and I don't subscribe to any of their mailing lists, so if Ubuntu is doing AI initiatives, I am not aware of it.
I request a 10% discount because that would help offset the costs associated with currency exchange and transfer charges.
I recommend those who want to use Ubuntu Linux to go download the installation image and try to install it on their PC or in their virtualized environment first.
Ubuntu Linux is very easy to use because the installation process is quite straightforward and the GUI is very nice, making it very precise.
I mentioned that legacy support should be increased for older software, but this is a business decision, and my company is also dropping legacy support due to cost.
I would rate Ubuntu Linux a nine out of ten as a total rating.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Open-source nature enables flexible programming and device integration
What is our primary use case?
I primarily use
Ubuntu Linux for programming in embedded systems. My laptop runs
Ubuntu Linux, and I have installed various IDEs and open-source software on it. For microcontroller programming, I utilize AVR and STM32. In addition, I design electronic circuit boards using KiCad.
What is most valuable?
Ubuntu Linux is lightweight, fast, and works seamlessly with command-line terminals. It is resource-saving and suitable for automation through scripting. Additionally, Ubuntu Linux's open-source nature supports community contributions, bolstering its development and support ecosystem. This flexibility allows for efficient programming and integration with various devices.
What needs improvement?
While Ubuntu Linux offers flexibility, it can lack support, especially when utilizing new versions. Stability issues occur when integrating new components due to physical or technical challenges. Additionally, I would like to see more flexibility in integrating Ubuntu Linux with newer devices, particularly in terms of CPU performance, RAM upgrades, and power-saving features.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Ubuntu Linux every day for over three years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
I face no significant challenges during Ubuntu Linux deployment. For example, setting up Ubuntu Linux on a Raspberry Pi involves a simple process of copying Linux onto an SD card, which takes about five minutes. However, configuring Ubuntu Linux for a server setup can be more complex and time-consuming, requiring up to a week.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Ubuntu Linux is generally stable, though there can be occasional issues with new hardware integration. Previously, I encountered downtime due to a new switch core integration, which resulted from physical cable problems rather than software issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Ubuntu Linux is scalable. In a server environment, it can seamlessly adapt to increased customer demand. Alarms help monitor resource usage, allowing for timely responses to scaling needs.
How are customer service and support?
I utilize community resources and
ChatGPT for support. The community around Ubuntu Linux is beneficial, providing answers to questions and assisting with issues.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have previously used Windows. Windows is a closed system, which makes flexibility and integration with various devices challenging compared to the more flexible open-source nature of Ubuntu Linux.
How was the initial setup?
Ubuntu Linux setup is straightforward, with documented guidelines. It includes backing up systems regularly, automating processes through scripts, and ensuring stable configurations for different use cases.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Ubuntu Linux is open-source, leading to cost savings through its free availability. Its resource efficiency further reduces costs by optimizing system performance.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
During discussions, I've worked with both Windows and Ubuntu Linux, comparing their features and capabilities.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend using Ubuntu Linux for its faster processing capabilities and lightweight nature. Ubuntu Linux is ideal for tasks demanding high performance and flexibility. It's highly customizable, making it suitable for a wide range of applications, from server environments to embedded systems. My overall rating for Ubuntu Linux is eight.
Reliable, open-source OS for developers and everyday use
What do you like best about the product?
I love how clean and user-friendly it feels, even for people switching from Windows. It’s stable, secure, and doesn’t slow down over time. Plus, the software center and terminal make installing stuff super easy
What do you dislike about the product?
Some hardware doesn't play nicely with Ubuntu right out of the box. I’ve had issues with Wi-Fi drivers or printers in the past, which can be frustrating if you’re not tech-savvy. Also, while gaming has improved, it's still not perfect compared to Windows.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Ubuntu gives me a stable, secure, and free environment for work and development, without the usual slowdowns or forced updates. It just works.
Best OS for Research Scientists
What do you like best about the product?
Open source , Easy to use, Gnome updates . Regular updates , Inbuilt coding platform. Virus free.
What do you dislike about the product?
Become heavier day by day. Loosing smoothness. Eats lots of RAM.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
All the coding environment are intigrated . Lots of software support via snap store.
Best OS for Productivity with Development
What do you like best about the product?
*Developer friendlyness
*Friendly User Interface
What do you dislike about the product?
Need to do some changes in BIOS to install
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Software development with containerization.
Sure
What do you like best about the product?
I like Ubuntu because it is a secure, stable, and free operating system. Its interface is intuitive, the installation is simple, and there is a large community that is always willing to help. Additionally, being open-source, I can customize and adapt it according to what I need, without worrying about licenses or additional costs.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I don't like about Ubuntu is that some programs are not compatible and sometimes it can be complicated to find the right drivers for certain devices. Additionally, in environments where systems like Windows predominate, its integration with certain programs or networks may not be as smooth. If you don't maintain a frequency of use, it's easy to forget some commands or configurations. Also, for those coming from other systems, the learning curve can be a challenge, and official support is not as accessible as in other systems.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Ubuntu has some issues, such as the lack of compatibility with certain Windows programs, the need to manually install some drivers, and integration with systems that primarily use Windows. At first, it can also be a bit difficult to get used to its operation. However, this helps me explore free alternatives, learn more about hardware and software, and develop skills in Linux, which can be useful for technology topics, QA, or even for my entrepreneurship.
Classy and developer favorite!
What do you like best about the product?
Good integration and with an excellent support. Easy to install apps on it.
What do you dislike about the product?
Somewhat clunky to administer it. A nice UI would have helped.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Primary operating system for me. Helps software development efforts.
Ubuntu Server 24.04 LTS User Review
What do you like best about the product?
1. Repository (apt) is updated with new packages which are latest one.
2. Systemctl command is more reliable in Ubuntu 24.04 version compare to Ubuntu 22.
3. Boot time taken in Ubuntu 24.04 is very fast compare to my other OS like Centos and Debian 11.
4. Reboot time taken after any configuration change is quite fast compare to Amazon Linux 2 as I did comparison for both OS and can say that AZ2 takes 2 min 4 sec to re-up the server while ubuntu 24.04 takes 1 min 3 sec compare to AZ2 for re-up. So we can say it saves half of the time.
5. It supports maximum range of lower version of Database i.e. mysql, maria-db.
6. Nginx and Apache both web server functions more smoothly in Ubuntu 24.04 OS.
What do you dislike about the product?
1. CPU core process utlization is quite high at start up of any web services like nginx and apache2.
2. SWAP space time to use in case of requirement is quite longer as compare to other OS. When I mount swap partition and try to use it but it was available not immediately but it was available after few more minutes post providing mount point.
So this second point is totally comes inder dislike category as it was totally irritating.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Latest packages which were not available in default repository are added in default repo in Ubuntu 24.04. Same issue was found in ubuntu 20 and ubuntu 22 version. So this is best benefit in my case. because to get latest package, we need to add manual repo and need to get that package from external repo which is resolved now.
Ubuntu server: A very nice experience
What do you like best about the product?
I usually setup servers to host websites and such, and Ubuntu server just makes that job a breeze, it contains all the normal tools you'd want, and is setup quite fast.
What do you dislike about the product?
I honestly don't think I can find anything I particularly dislike about it, it's just plain old ubuntu with no GUI, I would say I'd like to have some sort of web UI available to look at some quick statistics without ssh, but setting that up using external packages isn't hard by any means.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It allows me to easily install it on a local server or a vm on azure/aws and quickly setup a hosting server for any web application we develop.
Best server for docker and other things
What do you like best about the product?
It is easy to install and configure. It has been integrated with a lot of features like docker, juju, etc
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes, while updating, we face some issues. And ssh we need to install it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
For docker management and other hosting puposes.
