We use Red Hat Enterprise Linux to host website content.
CIS Hardened Image Level 1 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Center for Internet SecurityExternal reviews
236 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
A stable and mature solution that offers cost efficiency
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The tool's most valuable features are stability and maturity. Linux offers cost efficiency. Red Hat comes at the top of other Linux vendors. I am very satisfied with Red Hat Enterprise Linux's maturity.
What needs improvement?
We had issues migrating from the old to the new Red Hat Enterprise Linux version in the virtual environment. It forced us to spin up a new virtual environment to have the new Red Hat Enterprise Linux version.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Red Hat Enterprise Linux for over 15 years.
How are customer service and support?
My experience with Red Hat's support team is positive. They are a lot better than our cloud CMS vendor.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used Sun Microsystems and Unix on on-prem.
What other advice do I have?
The product supports our hybrid cloud strategy well.
We move workloads between different clouds and data sandboxes.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux's knowledge base is quite extensive. It is free, which helps us to advocate the product. I would like it to continue and rate it positive.
The Red Hat Enterprise Linux web console was helpful and offered visibility through dashboards. It helped us see what was going on with our system.
I rate it a nine out of ten.
Enhances security through overall hardening measures but needs better integrations
What is our primary use case?
We use Red Hat Enterprise Linux for our on-prem VM infrastructure. Recently, we got the OpenShift platform to help with containerization on-prem.
Moreover, containerization is one way we're trying to get rid of any legacy. We don't patch. We try to have a fresh build with the newer version of the patch. We try to use those Red Glue deployment strategies and remove whatever we find in misconfiguration or vulnerability instances rather than fixing them. We redeploy it.
How has it helped my organization?
In terms of improvement within the Linux environment, especially for a non-IT company like ours, where we have a limited number of Linux administrators and specialists in Linux hardening and security, Red Hat Enterprise Linux plays a significant role.
It eases the burden by restricting the use of open-source Linux and preventing the development community from obtaining their own images. This is crucial for maintaining a secure supply chain and ensuring the lockdown of live Linux packages.
However, when it comes to security compliance, I have not been exposed to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux security; we got the advanced cluster security from OpenShift, which has some vulnerability tracking within the cluster. Within Red Hat Enterprise Linux, I have not experienced the security console yet.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux has affected our systems and our security. It helps us achieve security standards. It's one of the hardening requirements so, it helps with that compliance requirement.
With standardization across the environment, we don't have to generate multiple artifacts for compliance, and having a single Linux platform management like Red Hat Enterprise Linux helps to satisfy auditors a little faster.
What is most valuable?
From a security perspective, the overall hardening of Red Hat Enterprise Linux is good. It has been effective in enhancing security.
Image management and hardening are essential, so we don't have to procure open-source Linux images that developers can get themselves. It adds a layer of security with signed images.
The knowledge base is pretty good.
What needs improvement?
From a cloud perspective, I'm looking for more integrations with native cloud services. For example, the ability to use native Azure Key Vault instead of Ansible Key Vault or Red Hat Key Vault.
Additionally, integrating image services from Red Hat into native image repositories such as Azure, Google, or third-party image repositories like JFrog is crucial. The key focus is on integration.
Red Hat should not become Microsoft and lock down functionalities within Red Hat.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Red Hat Enterprise Linux for two years.
How are customer service and support?
We have premium support, so it is pretty good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We are a mix of some other cloud virtualization technologies. The overall cloud information will define how we look down the road.
With Linux management, the pros are that it makes management a little easier. Overall, it is just a single view of the images we deploy in the organization.
The cons are that the integrations are a little tricky sometimes, and then we have to make exceptions to our policies. Better integration, more native service using more credentialless authentication, and authorization like using service principles or managing these over-store credentials would make it better.
How was the initial setup?
Currently, the emphasis is on on-premises solutions.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten because it needs more integrations.
Well-supported operating system, easy to deploy, and has good uptime and security
What is our primary use case?
We have general use cases.
How has it helped my organization?
It's a well-supported OS. I don't know what we'd use if we didn't have it.
Moreover, the last time I had an issue flagged with the vulnerability, I was able to go to the Red Hat website and find a patch. It worked pretty well.
The built-in security worked well when it came to solidifying risk production and maintaining compliance. The uptime or security of our systems has been pretty solid.
It helps us maintain our security standards and keeps us up to date on security.
What is most valuable?
One of the most valuable features is the package manager because it makes it easier to keep everything up to date.
What needs improvement?
The package compatibility between different releases is a little confusing sometimes.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Red Hat Enterprise Linux for 10 years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We've also used Ubuntu.
It's a matter of certain servers that need to be kept secure, so we chose Red Hat.
How was the initial setup?
When I order a server in our organization, it comes installed, and then they spin it up.
I am involved in the upgrade processes. The upgrades weren't complex but required some downtime. We don't normally upgrade until a particular OS version becomes end-of-life and the new one starts.
What about the implementation team?
Our in-house IT department did the deployment. We have a separate IT department that leverages the training provided by Red Hat.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten because most of the information I need I could find on the Red Hat website.
Has secure defaults and nice integrations for security and vulnerability scanning
What is our primary use case?
We have Ansible deployed on our Red Hat Enterprise Linux servers. We use it to manage the security of our fleet of Ubuntu virtual machines.
How has it helped my organization?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux is way ahead of Ubuntu in terms of security and compliance. It is mainly the ecosystem of data science tools that our developers want that pushes us in that direction. As a security engineer, I have a lot more peace at night knowing that my Red Hat servers are doing a good job keeping our Ansible infrastructure safe because that has fingers into everything we do. It is pretty critical.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux has not affected our system's uptime in any particularly noticeable way.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux has not enabled us to achieve security standards certification because we do not have any yet. We will have them hopefully in the future.
What is most valuable?
There are some nice integrations with scanning for vulnerabilities. That is the feature I have enjoyed the most because I am a security person, and that is my bread and butter.
Ansible has certainly been a game-changer. It is a lot easier to keep a whole bunch of virtual machines consistent with each other and make a change consistently across all of them. We use them for data science activities. Our data scientists are constantly trying out new packages and downloading new tools. We have to enable them to have root access on their machines but also need to ensure that they are not doing anything stupid at the same time. There are competitors to Ansible, but we are a big Python shop, so it is a very comfortable environment for us.
What needs improvement?
The only issue we have had with it is around the SELinux configuration because the way Ansible installs, it sticks the platform passwords in a flat file. We want that locked down more strongly than what is there currently with SELinux.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Red Hat Enterprise Linux for two years.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate their support an eight out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Primarily, we have used Ubuntu. We have had some of our use cases on CentOS, and then, of course, our workstations are all Windows, but I wish they were not.
We chose Ansible, and that chose Red Hat Enterprise Linux for us.
How was the initial setup?
We use Red Hat Enterprise Linux in the cloud. We have Azure because it is the corporate standard. We do not have any concerns about using Red Hat Enterprise Linux in the cloud. Obviously, everything in the cloud is more exposed than everything on-prem, but it has got good, sensible, and secure defaults built in, so there are no concerns there.
In terms of Red Hat Enterprise Linux upgrades, when we upgraded Ansible this fall, that pushed us from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8. It should be a little easier from now on. Now that we have made the big jump from the older Ansible to AAP, we will probably be upgrading the systems on a quarterly basis.
What was our ROI?
We probably have not yet seen an ROI. We purchased it a couple of years ago, but we have not had the time to put it to as much use as we wanted to put it to. The cost is low, so it would not take very long to reach a return on investment.
We have not made use of the Committed Spend.
What other advice do I have?
For its use case, I would rate Red Hat Enterprise Linux a ten out of ten.
Provides standardized processes, security effectiveness, and efficient updates
What is our primary use case?
All our infrastructure uses Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Every service we run is all Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Even containerization is on it.
How has it helped my organization?
It has improved our organization. It has standardized processes. Everyone uses it.
The upgrades are straightforward which helps when you want to move a major version of an upgrade. It's done in a standard way.
What is most valuable?
Everything we do is all Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Red Hat Enterprise Linux's security has been good because I have never seen any application going down due to security reasons.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux enables us to achieve security standard certification. For example, we have a very tightly SCC-regulated company so there are many rules that we are to follow and we are able to achieve this using Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for six years.
How was the initial setup?
We are all on-prem, but we also have some footprints in AWS but those images are also on Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux has supported our hybrid cloud strategy. We have a few things running on AWS. We have a few things on OpenShift. We are able to get all the basic images. It is easy to start and deploy anywhere.
One thing I like is the updates because when we patch it and upgrade it, we save a lot of time doing those upgrades and migrations.
Moreover, upgrades or migration to Red Hat Enterprise Linux have been straightforward in some ways. For example, we are currently migrating to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 and we have all our servers running on RHEL 7. We have scripts that are very easy to migrate.
For our implementation strategy, we go environment by environment. We start with our development environment. Once we are done with it, we test it. We have some automation test suites, test them, and we go to the upper environment.
What about the implementation team?
We worked directly with Red Hat for the deployment. We are already working on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 migration. Every year, whenever there is a major version release, we migrate to the major version.
What was our ROI?
We see a return on investment in terms of saving time. One thing I like is the updates because when we patch it and upgrade it, we save a lot of time doing those upgrades and migrations.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Enables users to roll out applications easily and provides excellent technical support
What is our primary use case?
We have a lot of Oracle databases, Tomcat, and Java microservices running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
How has it helped my organization?
A lot of our applications are like Java microservices. Deploying them on a Unix platform is so much easier. It's open-sourced and provides a lot of compatibility. It makes it easier for us to roll out applications. It is compatible with most Java microservices applications.
What is most valuable?
We like that Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a vendor-supported product. When we have problems, we just call Red Hat Enterprise Linux for support. The product employs a lot of automation tools to manage its OS. We love using Red Hat Satellite. We have close to 5000 servers. Managing individual servers would be a nightmare.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Red Hat Satellite help us automate our repetitive tasks. Every flavor of Linux distribution has its own specialties. The product offers a lot of integration within the Red Hat products suite. We use Red Hat products mostly, so it works for us.
What needs improvement?
The vendor keeps rolling out many packets, which complicates our job. We keep patching our servers. CVEs come out all the time. However, having a solid and secure OS will make our life much easier.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Red Hat Enterprise Linux since 2004.
How are customer service and support?
I never had any problem with support. I didn't have any issues that I did not get a resolution for. Sometimes, it takes a little bit of time, but eventually, it gets resolved.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I was using AIX, which is also an IBM product. IBM bought Red Hat Enterprise Linux. AIX was more expensive and required IBM System p. Moving to Red Hat Enterprise Linux was much easier because it is a lot more compatible with the regular hardware like HP and Dell that we buy on the market.
What was our ROI?
I have seen an improvement in our deployment. When we have applications running on Windows, it takes longer to get them set up and provisioned, and the security is different compared to Red Hat.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing could be better. The tool is getting expensive. Before, we could license only the hypervisor where Red Hat Enterprise Linux is running. Now, if a customer has a 12-node hypervisor, Red Hat Enterprise Linux forces customers to license all 12, even though they use only six.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated SUSE. At that time, SUSE did not have good support. We needed good support worldwide.
What other advice do I have?
We use AWS and Microsoft Azure as our cloud providers. We don't use the off-the-shelf product that we get from the cloud. We build around it because we have a standard template. When we deploy our solution in the cloud, all the security features we need are already within the OS, as opposed to using the cloud OS and applying all the changes we need. It's easier to get our template to the cloud and use it.
The licensing for the cloud environment is totally different than the on-premise one. We use the Virtual Datacenter license on-premises. I don't see any difference because Red Hat Enterprise Linux still supports it, whether on-premise or on the cloud.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux knows its product. Whenever I have an issue, an engineer gets assigned to me. I can always escalate if needed. We're not using every host that we license. We ensure that we can fail over smoothly on every single hypervisor. It's fair to license them. We're not using it, but we're still paying for it. I do not like it, but it is a business cost.
We migrate workloads to the cloud. I never upgrade an OS. I usually replace the old OS with a new OS and migrate the application. I use the OS versions 7, 8, and 9. The migration is pretty straightforward. AWS and Azure have a tool that we can use to integrate with our environment. It's a lift and shift. We grab the VM from our on-premise hypervisors and move it to the cloud.
We use Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform mostly for patching and upgrading to the next revisions. We don't upgrade from one OS to another. We build on a new OS and get all the applications running there. Once the application is running, we move all the workload from the old OS to the new OS. There's no impact on the existing system.
I don't do the day-to-day patching because we have a managed service. However, it does create interruption. When we do a patch, we have to reboot, especially when there's a kernel update. It causes an outage. I have used Red Hat Insights. It gives us insight into what's happening on every single Red Hat VM that we have. It tells us if it's behind or has some performance bottlenecks. It gives us visibility on the health of the whole OS.
People who are looking into the product must get a good account manager. We must have a good account manager who we can always contact and who gives us all the updates that we need. They keep us in the loop on what is happening in the Red Hat world. We are satisfied with the product.
Overall, I rate the tool a ten out of ten.
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Offers adaptability to modern technologies, training and good support
What is our primary use case?
All of our application services, application databases, and web services run on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Everything is on there.
How has it helped my organization?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux is certainly more secure than AIX, which is what we had. It's also better than Solaris. It has improved from that perspective. We can handle the vulnerabilities better. It's more secure.
Other than that, some of the products that we are using, we are migrating out of very costly license items. For example, we're using Fusion because we wanted to migrate, and then we started using Vision Manager. We did a POC a few years ago. We started using PAM because we wanted an engine in our workflow management system from that perspective.
We are still exploring a lot of items, but it's been a decent journey. It has helped to set up modern technologies.
What is most valuable?
We use a lot of Red Hat products. We use Red Hat PAM, Red Hat Session Manager, and the operating system.
We use the operating system the most because all our servers are on it.
The support is good. Red Hat provides use with a degree of training.
What needs improvement?
The adoption was slightly slow because the knowledge in the market is slightly less available. It's hard to find resources to actually support the product.
Some kind of training that can upskill the resource into this technology could certainly help.
For how long have I used the solution?
I started using Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 6 in 2019. We have our own data center.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used different solutions. We moved from AIX 7.1 to RHEL 6. Then we moved to 7. Now we're going to 8.
We chose Red Hat Enterprise Linux because we wanted to adopt newer technologies and we wanted to secure our systems. Red Hat Enterprise Linux was a good available option.
How was the initial setup?
It's on-prem right now. The deployment was straightforward.
I manage the infrastructure team so all of these things are under my purview.
We did hit some hiccups, but then RHEL's emergency support was available, and we were able to resolve it.
What about the implementation team?
We have an engineering team that analyzes different products. During the analysis phase, we look for all vulnerabilities.
Once it passes all of those things, it becomes available in our internal protocol. We have different names where it becomes available in our source space to get deployed.
Migrations and upgrades have been straightforward. For example, OpenSSL has different versions that are not supported on RHEL 7, which we have right now. There is a version that comes built-in.
We faced some issues, but we worked it out with Red Hat. They gave us a patch.
We're moving to RHEL 8 now. We moved to RHEL 7 last year; we're going to RHEL 8 now. Next year, in 2024, we plan to move to RHEL 8.
What was our ROI?
We saw a return on investment. It is helping the business.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is competitive. It's not low, but it is in the market.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Offers tools that provide valuable visibility and transparency regarding vulnerabilities, packages, and infected systems
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case for Red Hat Enterprise Linux is to set up and manage servers for various application teams, especially those dealing with hospital ADT applications. These applications handle critical data related to patient admissions and management within healthcare facilities.
While configuring Red Hat Enterprise Linux and its associated tools can be complex and sometimes frustrating, I have found that leveraging the support and resources provided by Red Hat is invaluable. Through collaboration with Red Hat's support team and a better understanding of the intricacies involved, we have significantly improved the speed and efficiency of managing our extensive infrastructure, making the process smoother and more manageable than before.
How has it helped my organization?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux has improved our system's security.
While measuring uptime is important, what matters most to us is improving the value and efficiency of patch and reboot cycles. Red Hat Enterprise Linux's tools, including Satellite and Ansible, provide valuable visibility and transparency regarding vulnerabilities, packages, and infected systems, helping enhance security and patch management.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Red Hat Enterprise Linux is the Ansible Automation Platform, closely followed by Satellite. These two tools are integral to our environment.
Satellite helps with provisioning, managing metadata, and licensing, while Ansible ensures uniform setup across our extensive environment, making the management of our infrastructure much smoother and more efficient.
What needs improvement?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux could be improved in several ways, especially regarding transparency and communication of new features. Enhancements could include better documentation and quick reference materials for various user groups, including developers, system administrators, etc.
Additionally, there could be improved visibility for new and improved commands within Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Many users still rely on outdated commands when newer, more efficient alternatives are available. Providing frequent updates and maintenance for resources like the admin blog would help improve communication and transparency regarding Red Hat Enterprise Linux's capabilities and features.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Red Hat Enterprise Linux for 11 years.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate the support for Red Hat Enterprise Linux an eight out of ten. There has been a noticeable improvement in their support, particularly after their acquisition by IBM.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The deployment of Red Hat Enterprise Linux was initially complex because we were not aware of all the available tools to streamline the process. We had to learn, but now we are more proficient.
Tasks that once took a month can now be completed in a week. We worked directly with Red Hat Enterprise Linux, without an integrated reseller or consultant.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a return on investment with Red Hat Enterprise Linux. By transitioning applications to the Red Hat Linux platform, we have been able to reduce our data center footprint and associated costs, such as electricity. This cost savings in other areas has been a clear benefit of using Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
What other advice do I have?
Our upgrade and migration plans are focused on a balance between stability and staying current with the latest and most secure versions of Red Hat.
While there is a desire to be on the cutting edge, we must consider what is currently in use by our clinicians and staff who rely on our hospital systems. We aim to strike a balance between these factors and leverage a sandbox environment to test the latest versions before deploying them in our production environment.
We have been thoroughly impressed with Red Hat Insights and are currently in the process of exploring Leapp, which has shown great results in our evaluations. The web console has been invaluable for us, particularly when collaborating with application custodians who may not be familiar with the command line interface.
We use Ansible for managing our Red Hat Enterprise Linux systems for provisioning and patching, which has improved visibility and reduced issues compared to third-party solutions. Overall, I would rate Red Hat Enterprise Linux as a nine out of ten.
Helped us achieve our security standard certifications
How has it helped my organization?
The SAP solution subscriptions have made things a lot easier because it's a standard build.
The solutions were premium and standard, which were not the same. They've combined those into just one standard version. Only the support hours are different. That is fantastic for us. It makes life easier.
For the standard subscriptions, in the past, updating the OS could increase your downtime. With the production ones, it did not. It got our non-production and production out of sync. Now, they've combined that all into one. It's just the support hours that are different. They're fantastic.
What is most valuable?
We use the SAP solution subscriptions only for SAP, which are great.
We also use Ansible. Ansible is a wonderful tool for automation. We use it to automate our patching. We use Ansible to get playbooks to take care of anything that's manual.
We were able to achieve our security standard certifications.
What needs improvement?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux has affected our HA systems in a negative way. We're working through some of those issues.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 came up with a new feature that's like a MOM API in our cluster. It goes out into the AWS side and it needs to be adjusted. It does a retry that causes a cluster to failover pretty quickly, so we turned that feature off. That's something that could be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Red Hat Enterprise Linux for a long time. It has been at least 10 to 15 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
How are customer service and support?
Support has been great. We get the right people for what we need.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The patching has been good, but we scan with Qualys all the time. It comes up with thousands of EIDs all the time, but putting on the patches seems to resolve that.
We're operating right now from 7.9 to 8.6. We have to go with the supported versions. We did qualify for RHEL 9.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We used Unix in the past. We did have to come up with the SAP side. It was always Unix.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Has strong security features, and excellent compatibility for enterprise environments
What is our primary use case?
We are currently in the midst of a POC phase with a standalone cluster. This cluster consists of both coordinator and worker nodes, with a metadata store for storing various metadata. The entire setup is deployed on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, and we have established a connection to the OpenShift UI.
What is most valuable?
While using it, we encountered far fewer complexities, and the entire process is much smoother and streamlined. For patching purposes, we simply need to communicate with our system administrator. They take care of the patching process, so we don't have to get involved and we can easily connect to the artifact repository and download the necessary artifacts to install in our system.
We have a set of JSON files containing YAML configurations where all the required image details are documented and this setup makes it very straightforward for us.As for the Web Console, if you're talking about the user interface for tasks like creating ports, deploying applications, managing secrets, and other functions, I haven't encountered any significant issues.
The process is generally straightforward and quick, taking just a few minutes. OpenShift offers two types of interfaces: one where you can edit YAML files for more advanced customization, and the other where you can use forms for faster deployment, though with fewer features.
What needs improvement?
Continuous improvement is essential to enhance user experiences and address evolving needs.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with it for approximately six months.
How are customer service and support?
Our experience with its customer support is very good. Whenever we encounter any issues, we receive prompt and comprehensive assistance. There's no need to wait or take any additional steps to get the help we require, which is highly appreciated. I would rate it nine out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
In the past, our work primarily involved Hadoop, and we also dealt with Solid Cloud for security and other purposes, but we found that this setup was slow and not open source. On the other hand, the DLP solution we're currently using is not only cost-effective but also significantly faster.
I also used a Linux browser, specifically the KCL browser which required me to go through the process of installing packages and various components, while in the current setup, everything is seamlessly connected. We simply use the OC command with a private key to connect to OpenShift. There are no extra or additional steps required, making the whole process exceptionally fast and efficient. It's quite remarkable and makes the workflow truly hassle-free.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was easy.
What about the implementation team?
The deployment process is straightforward. I simply had to deploy the images using OC commands, and the process of connecting to OpenShift was remarkably fast and smooth.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.
showing 251 - 260