A specific example of how I use Trend Micro Deep Security in my daily work involves a critical vulnerability related to Apache Log4j that was recently announced. Before the patching, I checked the IPS module and had a virtual patch available. By enabling that rule for Log4j, all servers were protected from exploitation without waiting for vendor-released patches, preventing potential data breaches and downtime during the patching window.

I use zero-day exploit mitigation with Trend Micro Deep Security. Whenever a zero-day vulnerability is announced, Trend Micro Deep Security's virtual patching via the Intrusion Prevention System protects workloads before vendor patches can be applied, and ransomware protection is also available. My team manages hundreds of servers across on-premise and cloud environments, and when a critical vulnerability is announced, applying OS patches manually would take days and require downtime. As a Trend Micro Deep Security engineer, I have virtual patching via IPS that instantly protects all workloads and systems without scheduling maintenance windows, eliminating emergency patching chaos, preventing downtime, and allowing faster compliance reporting. This enables my team to focus on strategic tasks instead of manual patching. The centralized dashboard also makes work much easier.

In terms of automation, auto-deployment of agents integrates with cloud APIs and orchestration tools including Chef, Puppet, and Ansible to automatically install and configure the agents on new workloads. Policy automation applies protections based on tags or templates, ensuring that whenever a new server is created, it receives the right protection without manual intervention. Scheduled tasks automate malware scans, log inspections, and integrity checks at predefined intervals, and CI/CD pipeline integration allows checks to be embedded into DevOps workflows, ensuring containers and workloads are scanned before deployment.

Trend Micro Deep Security has positively impacted my organization by reducing risk and response times while being cost-effective and saving on operational efficiency, compliance, audit readiness, scalability, and business agility, supporting both on-premise and container workloads.

Virtual patching via IPS protects all servers instantly, resulting in no downtime and eliminating overtime labor, saving around $50,000. Additionally, there is a reduced risk of breach. For improved efficiency, with Trend Micro Deep Security, I built 100 new cloud instances without needing manual agent installations and policy assignments, which would have taken hours and delayed securing workloads, ultimately increasing risk. With Trend Micro Deep Security automation, agent deployment occurs automatically via AWS and Azure integration, and policies are applied instantly based on tags, saving eight to ten hours per deployment cycle, allowing my team to focus on more strategic tasks instead of manual deployment and patching.

Additional recommendations for improvements include policy optimization and enhanced reporting features.

We switched from Symantec because it was taken over by Broadcom, and we were not receiving proper customer support from Broadcom, which led us to make the change.

Trend Micro Deep Security serves as my main solution for antivirus and endpoint security. In this use case, we manage security policies, file protection, and scanning activities with Trend Micro Deep Security.

Virtual patching stands out as the best feature Trend Micro Deep Security offers. Patching allows us to virtually patch servers without downtime, which is critical given our limited patching windows, and helps prevent servers from being exploited.

The alerting system is another valuable feature, as we can use the logs for SIEM integration and receive real-time alerts, enabling us to track and work on any issues. Activity monitoring and automation in Trend Micro Deep Security have saved us time and improved our response time for critical alerts, as we immediately receive alerts that prompt our team to begin working on them.

The most prominent positive impacts of Trend Micro Deep Security on my organization include how we configure alerting and automate tasks. Additionally, we are using cloud security capabilities, and the file integrity monitoring is very helpful.

The console provided by Trend Micro Deep Security seems quite complicated. Although Trend Micro Deep Security offers many features related to policy creation, making it more user-friendly would encourage more people to use it and enhance trust in the product.

The main improvement needed is to make the console's appearance more attractive. I work with multiple platforms, including Defender, Sophos, Palo Alto Networks, and Proofpoint, and the dark colors of Trend Micro Deep Security's console can deter administrators from spending time on it.

I have been in my current field for more than five years.

Trend Micro Deep Security is comparatively stable in its performance.

The scalability of Trend Micro Deep Security is adequate, as it is utilized across our enterprise services, making it scalable.

I have interacted with customer support mostly for analysis when we encounter issues. About eighty percent of the time, we receive satisfactory responses, with the remaining twenty percent reflecting delays or the necessity for their internal engineering team to provide assistance.

I previously used McAfee, which is now Trellix. We made the switch after a ransomware attack in our organization on November 9, 2022, when McAfee failed to detect the ransomware threat.

Before selecting Trend Micro Deep Security, I looked into Defender due to its lower costs and also reviewed Sophos, as we were already utilizing it to manage external devices on laptops. After reviewing both, we decided on Trend Micro Deep Security.

I would rate Trend Micro Deep Security around eight out of ten. I chose an eight out of ten because I noted two points regarding the console not being visually appealing or simple to operate and the limitations in creating various policies, emphasizing the need for flexibility in policy creation to show clients that we can implement advanced security measures such as zero-trust segmentation.

My advice for others looking to use Trend Micro Deep Security is to consider the excellent feature of virtual patching, particularly if they currently only run basic antivirus or file integrity systems. Trend Micro Deep Security is good and has significantly contributed to my career growth, but I am very unhappy with its current performance, as it struggles to compete with CrowdStrike. Customers often prioritize attractiveness and marketing over product performance. I have assigned a review rating of eight to Trend Micro Deep Security.

For Trend Micro Deep Security, I mainly implement and monitor policies and create policies regarding recommendations. I allow and block applications, create trusted zones, and establish firewall rules.

We have created server-to-server policies. We monitor all the policies and create them based on what we are blocking in our network. For application control, there are many trusted banking applications, so we have to exclude them. We have created rules by vendors.

For anti-malware, we are using a weekly scheduled scan. We monitor the logs to see if any alerts are coming and if it's working or not. We also have daily security patch updates and monitor the alerts and reports on a daily basis.

There is also application control and activity monitoring, such as web control. There is a web reputation module.

The best feature of Trend Micro Deep Security is log monitoring, integrity monitoring, and IDS/IPS rules, which are basically for virtual patching and zero-day attacks. It's very easy to use and a very powerful tool for server security.

For integrity monitoring, when a user's privileges are escalated, for example, from a least privilege user, and they are running an administrator tool or deleting sensitive files, it will show us that someone is using that command. For log monitoring, when we view the application and operating system logs, they go to our SIEM or SOAR and give me in-depth alerts on that behalf.

For Trend Micro Deep Security, there is no hash value separator. In Trend Micro, there is one option they have to add for a hash value block. We have to depend on a third-party tool, hash tools. Also, we are not able to manually delete any hash from the console. We have to go to the SQL database, and from there, we have to do that. So it's just a process for SQL.

I took one point off for the integration part for SIEM. It gives you all the things, but for incidents, it gives them to you module-wise. You have to integrate it based on specific log types, so it depends on which SIEM you are using, such as Splunk, QRadar, or LogRhythm.

I have been working with Trend Micro Deep Security for the last 3.5 years.

Trend Micro Deep Security is very stable. If it's not, you have to create a case, and they will release new code for that.

For Trend Micro Deep Security's scalability, you can use it for a better experience. It's easy to install script-wise. You can install it on a script basis for Linux and Windows. In my opinion, we get 80 to 90% resolution of installation. For all other different types of OS, it will give you different types of operating system agents. But if you are not able to switch operating systems, you can also install it with a script. For Windows, it's one way, and for Linux, it's another.

The customer support is good. For premium, it basically comes within three hours. A dedicated support engineer will come in within three hours, but if your Trend Micro account manager is good, it will be aligned within one to two hours.

On a scale of 1 to 10, I will rate the customer support at eight because it takes about five to six hours or one day to get its analysis.

Previously we were using Trellix server security. In Trellix, we were getting very strong effects of slowness. That's why we changed. The server hung sometimes, and due to that, our business was hampered.

We evaluated Trend Micro Deep Security with Sophos, and not only Sophos, we evaluated it with CrowdStrike, but CrowdStrike did not have such granular-level security postures.

We have implemented Trend Micro Deep Security in our organization and have been working with it for the last six to seven years. As compared with other solutions, it's very easy to use. To implement or troubleshoot at an L1 or L2 level, there are more KB articles for that and in-depth knowledge about what to do with a step-by-step procedure. It's easy to implement, configure, deploy, and also monitor the logs.

For Trend Micro Deep Security, we save our time creating policies, and we never have to go to L3 or L8 level engineers because we can resolve and troubleshoot all the issues on our own on behalf of the KBs. The Trend Micro KB articles are very useful for that. Also, its support is great. For a product with great services, there is no struggle to work with it.

The reporting is good. All events are very customizable, but we will say about blocking the hashes. In today's market for server security, I have never seen any other OEM's product which is close to it. For one node, the price is much more than other products. When we talk about other OEMs, it's 10 to 12K. But when we come to Trend Micro Deep Security, one node is approximately 25 to 30K.

Trend Micro Deep Security is a premium segment product. Definitely not money saved, but you have no tension for the business, their compromisation, and things. Also, their updates are much better than other OEMs. It is also easy to use, so there are no negative points for that part.

My advice to others looking into using Trend Micro Deep Security is that for a better experience, it is easy to use. We just have to schedule updates and upgrades. It will automatically upgrade, and there is customer support or articles support. It's really very helpful for troubleshooting. If you face any issue, you have to simply go on Chrome and search the error code. It will give you details on what to do, why to do it, and why it happens.

I rate Trend Micro Deep Security a nine out of ten.

My main use case for Trend Micro Deep Security is its best feature, virtual patching, which allows us to secure our server against known vulnerabilities without having to immediately apply OS or application patches. This has helped reduce downtime, improve compliance, and safeguard critical workloads. The solution has seven modules, including anti-malware, web reputation, firewall, integrity monitoring, and log inspection, but its best feature remains virtual patching.

I use Trend Micro Deep Security in multiple organizations, primarily in the financial sector and multiple banks, where I have protected both our physical and virtual servers from vulnerabilities. Its role is primarily virtual patching, meaning if our server is vulnerable due to a zero-day attack and a patch is not applied, Trend Micro Deep Security creates a virtual patch. That remains the best feature. I perform day-to-day operations with it.

I have implemented and tested multiple use cases on Trend Micro Deep Security solution for different modules, including intrusion prevention and integrity monitoring. For the anti-malware module, I have tested and observed how this product protects against any malicious or suspicious activity.

The best features Trend Micro Deep Security offers include virtual patching and comprehensive protection from multiple modules such as anti-malware, web reputation, firewall, integrity monitoring, and log inspection. It is very user-friendly, easy to understand, and helps us integrate multiple products with Deep Security.

The user-friendly aspect and integration of Trend Micro Deep Security have helped my team significantly. For example, we can integrate our SIEM product, Active Directory, and multiple platforms. If an operations engineer cannot find something or forgets about a suspicious activity, we can identify the suspicious thing with the help of the SIEM. With Active Directory, we maintain our compliance, checking which server has Deep Security and which does not. By integrating these solutions, we effectively maintain compliance in our environment.

Trend Micro Deep Security has positively impacted our organization because we have implemented it for multiple purposes, primarily for server security. It is installed on both multiple virtual and physical servers with minimal performance impact. It has been extremely stable throughout our usage, with no major disturbances.

Trend Micro Deep Security is a good solution. I have been working on and using this product for almost four years. While it is fundamentally good, the patches are released every month; if it could remain stable for a longer time, it would be helpful instead of requiring monthly patches.

Regarding outcomes, I have noticed reduced downtime potentially due to higher utilization on the server. By adding an exception, we can minimize this type of incident. Additionally, we can track which incidents are happening through the XDR solution.

I have been using Trend Micro Deep Security for almost four years and continue to use it.

Trend Micro Deep Security is a stable product. It has positively impacted our organization because we have implemented it for multiple purposes, primarily for server security. It is installed on both multiple virtual and physical servers with minimal performance impact. It has been extremely stable throughout our usage, with no major disturbances.

When discussing scalability, Trend Micro Deep Security is used in multiple organizations across the financial and retail sectors.

The customer support for Trend Micro Deep Security is good, and they provide timely responses.

I previously used Symantec and Trellix products before switching to Trend Micro Deep Security because the tech support was delayed and not satisfactory. I struggled to get timely assistance.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trend Micro Deep Security is almost good and average.

I have seen a return on investment with Trend Micro Deep Security. It is a time-saving and money-saving product. The management console is very useful and easy to operate, allowing policy deployment in a minimal amount of time.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trend Micro Deep Security is almost good and average.

Before choosing Trend Micro Deep Security, I evaluated other options such as CrowdStrike, among multiple products in the market.

I strongly recommend Trend Micro Deep Security to any organization looking for a powerful, scalable, and future-ready server security solution. It has been invaluable for us, and I believe it will be equally beneficial for future users and buyers.

Trend Micro Deep Security is a powerful solution in the market for server security.

My advice for others considering Trend Micro Deep Security is to strongly recommend it as a powerful, stable, and future-ready server security solution. It has been invaluable for us, and I believe it will be equally beneficial for future users.

On a scale of one to ten, I rate Trend Micro Deep Security a nine.

In my current scenario with the MFS company, Trend Micro Deep Security is used for servers protection. Our Unix system and Windows system have several services, so for the servers protection, firewall, application control and IPS, IDS, we are working to ensure this actual protection for the solution and servers.

The best features of Trend Micro Deep Security are its protection layer and its total control of the servers. As of now, in all of the endpoint security solutions and server security solutions, only cloud-centric options exist, but for on-premises, Trend Micro Deep Security is one of the best solutions for servers.

The protection layer and total control features of Trend Micro Deep Security provide comprehensive protection. It has multiple security layers, including anti-malware, intrusion prevention, integrity monitoring, web reputation, application control, firewall, and log inspection. With a single lightweight agent, I have access to all of the protection layers. It also provides flexibility for Windows, Linux, and cloud workloads, as I am managing a hybrid infrastructure through Trend Micro Deep Security. Additionally, I benefit from centralized management, policy enforcement, monitoring, and quick response to threats. It also complies with regulatory standards such as PCI DSS, GDPR, and ISO 27001. Compared to other solutions, it's beneficial to have so many features consolidated in a single solution which is competitive with other companies.

Currently, we have the XDR solutions on top of Trend Micro Deep Security. In XDR, I get extra deep dive knowledge and deep dive features. We see there is the root cause ability when we find out in the XDR integration feature, which is the actual Vision One XDR with Trend Micro Deep Security. It's good to have, and they have the Vision One platform, which is good for day-to-day reaching. The feature-wise implementation is good.

In the area of policy management and overall administration, Trend Micro Deep Security could improve some settings that require attention. Their UI/UX also needs improvement to make it more user-friendly. If someone is not well-versed in Trend Micro Deep Security or lacks expertise, they can't use or utilize these tools effectively. Therefore, user experience improvement is most crucial, along with enhancements in policy management and the accuracy of the IPS, IDS features for real-time protection.

It is primarily focused on the firewall policy management, and if any server is blocked through any rule, a proactive dashboard or alert would be helpful.

I am using Trend Micro Deep Security for more than five years.

Since implementing Trend Micro Deep Security, there have been some hiccups. As a new solution running in operations, I encounter everyday busy operations. During the implementation phase, some issues arise for tuning. After proper tuning the configuration, it is now good to have stability in terms of communication and other aspects. Also, there is an improvement in the security layer. Until now, I haven't faced any anti-malware threat because of all of the proactive protections available in Trend Micro Deep Security, especially in the IPS portion and virtual patching which covers various aspects.

Trend Micro Deep Security is stable.

In terms of scalability, Trend Micro Deep Security has inbuilt features such as HA options and load balancing options. Customers can also use SQL HA for their database high availability.

In terms of customer support, I think they need to exhibit more proactiveness. That is the lacking we are facing, and thus I believe they need improvement in customer support.

In my current organization, Trend Micro Deep Security is the only solution used. However, with 12 years of experience, I have used other solutions such as CrowdStrike, Trend Micro, Symantec, Kaspersky, and ESET. I possess a diverse range of experience with these products, but compared to dedicated server security, Trend Micro Deep Security is a good solution.

I evaluated and tested other solutions in my previous organizations. Here, only Trend Micro Deep Security is employed, but as I mentioned earlier, I also have experience with Kaspersky, CrowdStrike, Sophos, and Symantec among other products.

The pricing and licensing for Trend Micro Deep Security is typical; in that part, it's high, obviously, compared to other competitors. However, if I round up all of the solutions in a single package, then the pricing is medium, reflecting a medium pricing calculation.

Trend Micro Deep Security is a good solution if you consider hybrid solutions or integrate it with XDR and EDR portions. However, if you do not consider the cloud or hybrid aspects, there are limitations. As an on-prem solution, it can single-handedly resolve your problems and protect your organization and servers. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Trend Micro Deep Security a 9.

We have many use cases. We deployed it, and we replaced Semantic with Trend Micro Deep Security for one of our customers in the Telecom sector. Some of our customers are actually looking for Microsoft solutions because most of the endpoints and the infrastructure are Microsoft-based, so they want the platform to be the same.

We are satisfied because we have experience deploying it in a big Telecom sector that has 7,000 NPCs, and they are running different services, Microsoft, Linux-based, and some other operating systems with many applications. They remain satisfied.

At different time spans, we often required technical support. Their portal is available, or we engage with this for any technical issue or if there is any breach, so they often get help from them, and their technical team works with our teams to find out different issues.

Trend Micro Deep Security has very good features such as virtual patching and almost all other features are the same as all the Endpoint detection and response systems are capable of doing the security features such as deep scanning, secret scanning, and the advantage of Microsoft is that it protects the cloud services as it protects the on-prem.

For threat detection, they use heuristic behavior detection, and sometimes, if they think there is a sort of attack which is new, they alert you, and they detect and show where the attack is coming from. They even suggest patching or any solution to stop that attack.

Trend Micro Deep Security is not a very cheap solution, but customers are satisfied. It's working, so every year, once they purchase it, and after a year, they renew it, or whenever the subscription expires, they renew it, unless there is any security breach.

Trend Micro Deep Security should provide a bundle solution for the customer similar to what Microsoft provides. For example, Microsoft provides ATP solution in their Defender, that not only filters the emails but also detects spam and malware in attachments, and it provides security for SharePoint solution, Teams, and other products available on the cloud.

Most of the features are adequate. Customers are satisfied. If there are some new types of attacks which are still not identified, these vendors will improve their solutions according to the attacks.

One important improvement would be to reduce their cost. The countries which are progressing, and which have budget issues, such as third world countries or poor countries, have very limited budgets. They have to pay in dollars, and the dollar is very expensive in most countries.

We have been working with Microsoft's Trend Micro Deep Security solutions for the last 3 years.

Implementation is not complex. It has been so far good. One important aspect that should be addressed is they should try to reduce their cost.

We have different experiences. Sometimes one Endpoint Security solution could not detect or mitigate any attack type, while the other one works adequately and sometimes, Microsoft solution doesn't work adequately for any sort of attacks. We have different sorts of experiences and responses from the customer side.

There are some minor issues, which are mostly NPC or user end issues such as when they use unwanted software or click on illegitimate or malicious links. There are issues regarding the end user, but as far as the software is concerned, we believe that software works fine until it is patched, managed, or monitored by the IT teams.

It's an enterprise company. They have many endpoints. There are more than 3,000 endpoints, but in most organizations, they are using a mix of these security solutions. They use it for comparison base, and they sometimes have budget issues, so they use it in different departments.

Support in Trend Micro Deep Security is very good. They have very professional engineers, and they often respond effectively. We are satisfied.

It's not difficult to maintain because we have experience that when the customer is trained adequately, and if they are really concerned about security, they maintain it properly. They have the IT teams, security teams to look after the server endpoints and monitor them, patch them and if there is any vulnerability or any detection found on the endpoints, they try to mitigate that.

Mostly in our country, customers are quickly migrating to the cloud. We get different sorts of requirements from the customers in different sectors, such as customers in the Banking sector have different requirements, customers in the Government sector have different requirements.

We give the comparison and demo to the customer. If the customer is interested in technical capabilities, we demonstrate the tools, setup, implementation, and their working. At the end, the customer is more interested in the cost.

We give the comparison and demo to the customer. If the customer is interested in technical capabilities, we demonstrate the tools, setup, implementation, and their working. At the end, the customer is more interested in the cost. This is the strategy. We give a fair comparison of all the products, and give them clear insights of the products, which makes it helpful for the customer to make a final decision to purchase the license or product.

If it meets the customer budget, we will recommend Trend Micro Deep Security.

We recommend them because the virtual patching is a very good feature. Customers are very satisfied, especially when there is Microsoft infrastructure. We pitch them the solution stating that if there is any security breach in the market, then this solution is capable, based on the information, it virtually patches your servers even if Microsoft has not released the real patch for that issue.

Implementation is not complex. It has been good so far.

We give the comparison and demo to the customer. If the customer is interested in technical capabilities, we demonstrate the tools, setup, implementation, and their working. At the end, the customer is more interested in the cost. This is the strategy.

It's not difficult to maintain because we have experience that when customers are trained adequately, and if they are really concerned about security, they maintain it properly. They have the IT teams, security teams to look after the server endpoints and monitor them, patch them, and if there is any vulnerability or any detection found on the endpoints, they try to mitigate that.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Trend Micro Deep Security as an eight.

We are using it for NetSpark, and I work for two organizations where I'm using this tool. In both, we are scaling our networks and endpoints, analyzing our traffic, and analyzing the endpoints and security.

In one organization where I started, we were using a SIEM solution and facing challenges like a lack of complete information. Deep Security has helped us to know where intrusion started, penetrated, and went within our network, thereby improving security.

I appreciate the complete visibility of information, including endpoints and detailed tracing from origin to navigation. It helps us detect and protect against network penetrations at the specific point of intrusion.

New patterns need improvement, as some new data access points are challenging to investigate and allow entry without detection. Improving this area and providing complete visibility would be beneficial.

I have been using this product for nearly eleven months.

I would rate the stability as eight out of ten.

I rate technical support a nine.

I previously used QRadar. Compared to QRadar, Trend Micro improves quickly based on feedback and provides more comprehensive solutions.

In one premises, we deployed it on the cloud, which was challenging at the start, while on another it was set on TensorFlow, which was comparatively easy.

Their team was very helpful during the deployment process. Trend Micro's team was particularly cooperative.

It has saved us time, money, and resources. We saved nearly forty percent of our time previously spent on manual investigations.

The pricing is very fair, although there are other cheaper options. Due to our limitations, Trend Micro was our best option.

I would rate it an eight out of ten.